Thanks, f/fgeorge, that seems plausible.
The odd thing is that the tweak site where this reg key is identified
suggests that the values CLIMB as the memory increases.
http://www.liutilities.com/products/registrybooster/tweaklibrary/tweaks/11420/
128KB cache = 80
256KB cache = 100
512KB cache = 200
and so on
That page doesn't seem outdated: They have screenshots of dialogue boxes
displayed in the Vista interface theme.
a.k.a.
"f/fgeorge" wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 17:45:26 -0800, a.k.a.
> <aka RemoveThis @discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >Hello everyone,
> >
> >This is incredibly confusing: It's my understanding that this is the
> >registry key where the value of the L2 cache is set:
> >
> >[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Session Manager\Memory
> >Management\]
> >
> >In Server 2008 RC2 (Hyper-V) the value I'm finding is 0!!!! What's going on?
> >
> >Am I not making any use of the 4MB of L2 cache in my Centrino Pro? Shouldn't
> >it automatically set itself to 1600 [which I guess would be the value for
> >4MB]?
> >
> >I'd really appreciate any insights anyone has!
> >
> >a.k.a.
> The L2 cache is a cpu setting not a software setting. What you are
> seeing is not a function of how the cpu functions but more likely how
> Windows is supporting the cpu's L2 cache. If a cpu's L2 cache were say
> 128k then maybe your number in the registry would be larger. But since
> it found a larger than minimum number on the cpu it set the software
> cache at zero.
> Vista does that, they do thru software what the L2 cpu cache does on
> the chip.
> There should be a forum on MS's own website for Server 2008 and you
> should really ask there.
>