|
Related Topics:
| Sony Ericsson T68i (unlocked) for sale - For sale T68i with data cable Best offer +shipping gets it.
motorolla v551 v505 - can anyone tell me how to backup my ringtones i bought and my phone is dying and i am getting a please advise thank you
Text messaging on ATTWS - I have a Nokia 6820 on GSM national plan. it has a 140 character limit on incoming messages. With previous carriers I had, this limit was much higher, or it would truncate the message into 2 or 3 or as many as it needed to get the entire..
Sony Ericsson K750i on ATT/Cingular Review - Glad I didnt buy the ginormous S700! Photos are great...
former attws subscribers: sms number changes - Today I got a surprise. Outgoing text messaging stopped working on our phones. I called customer service and was told that as part of the ongoing merger of the ATTWS and Cingular networks, the SMS number has changed. Surprise! Why, in the name of..
|
|
|
Next: AT&T Wireless: avotmv - streaming video to iphone
|
| Author |
Message |
External

Since: Dec 14, 2007 Posts: 672
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 4:38 pm
Post subject: SPRINT = a "meltdown," a "miserable performance" and a "disaster" - Archived from groups: alt>cellular>attws, others (more info?)
|
|
|
Sprint shares plummet after job cuts
from BusinessWeek
NEW YORK
Shares of beleaguered Sprint Nextel Corp. took a nosedive Friday after
the nation's third-largest wireless carrier said it continued to lose
subscribers at an alarming rate during the fourth quarter and will lay
off thousands to cut costs.
A "meltdown," a "miserable performance" and "disaster" were some of
the words analysts used to describe Sprint's predicament Friday. The
company said it lost 683,000 postpaid subscribers during the quarter.
Wall Street had expected a loss of about 250,000 to subscribers,
according to Goldman Sachs analyst Jason Armstrong.
Sprint also announced plans to cut 4,000 jobs, close 8 percent of its
retail locations and reduce its use of contractors and outsourced
services. While investors have been expecting the company to outline a
cost-cutting plan since its new CEO took helm, Armstrong said in a
client note the cuts were already in the works under interim
management.
"Hence, we would warn that new CEO Dan Hesse has yet to take his cut
at the business," he wrote. "He has historically been aggressive on
cost cuts and conservative on guidance, so look for more reductions
when he finalizes his plan."
Hessem, who took over as Sprint's CEO in December, is the former chief
executive of Sprint spinoff Embarq, where he cut more than 1,200 jobs.
He replaced Gary Forsee, who was ousted in October following several
quarters of falling subscriber numbers and other operational troubles
for the company.
Sprint did not mention its WiMax service, Xohm, when announcing the
job cuts, and Cowen and Co. analyst Thomas Watts said the company "may
continue with a slow launch in select markets as planned, but may
reevaluate its strategy going forward." Sprint, he added, may scale
back WiMax spending as it focuses on improving its core wireless
business. The project has been viewed by some as too expensive and
years away from turning a profit.
Most analysts kept "Hold" ratings on Sprint's stock, noting that the
company is in the midst of a turnaround that may have to get worse
before it gets better. In the meantime, Sprint's subscriber defections
should benefit Verizon Wireless and AT&T Inc. -- though the shares of
both companies fell on Friday.
Sprint's shares plunged $2.91, or 25.2 percent, to $8.66 in afternoon
trading. The stock has lost nearly 35 percent of its value since the
start of the year. Earlier Friday, shares hit $8.15, their lowest
level since 2002.
Verizon's shares fell $1.91, or 4.7 percent, to $39. AT&T's shares
fell $1.29, or 3.5 percent, to $36.01. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Aug 23, 2005 Posts: 85
|
(Msg. 2) Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 4:46 pm
Post subject: Re: SPRINT = a "meltdown," a "miserable performance" and a "disaster" [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Jan 18, 6:38 pm, 4phun <vic.hea... DeleteThis @gmail.com> wrote:
> Sprint shares plummet after job cuts
>
> from BusinessWeek
>
> NEW YORK
>
> Shares of beleaguered Sprint Nextel Corp. took a nosedive Friday after
> the nation's third-largest wireless carrier said it continued to lose
> subscribers at an alarming rate during the fourth quarter and will lay
> off thousands to cut costs.
>
> A "meltdown," a "miserable performance" and "disaster" were some of
> the words analysts used to describe Sprint's predicament Friday. The
> company said it lost 683,000 postpaid subscribers during the quarter.
> Wall Street had expected a loss of about 250,000 to subscribers,
> according to Goldman Sachs analyst Jason Armstrong.
>
> Sprint also announced plans to cut 4,000 jobs, close 8 percent of its
> retail locations and reduce its use of contractors and outsourced
> services. While investors have been expecting the company to outline a
> cost-cutting plan since its new CEO took helm, Armstrong said in a
> client note the cuts were already in the works under interim
> management.
>
> "Hence, we would warn that new CEO Dan Hesse has yet to take his cut
> at the business," he wrote. "He has historically been aggressive on
> cost cuts and conservative on guidance, so look for more reductions
> when he finalizes his plan."
>
> Hessem, who took over as Sprint's CEO in December, is the former chief
> executive of Sprint spinoff Embarq, where he cut more than 1,200 jobs.
> He replaced Gary Forsee, who was ousted in October following several
> quarters of falling subscriber numbers and other operational troubles
> for the company.
>
> Sprint did not mention its WiMax service, Xohm, when announcing the
> job cuts, and Cowen and Co. analyst Thomas Watts said the company "may
> continue with a slow launch in select markets as planned, but may
> reevaluate its strategy going forward." Sprint, he added, may scale
> back WiMax spending as it focuses on improving its core wireless
> business. The project has been viewed by some as too expensive and
> years away from turning a profit.
>
> Most analysts kept "Hold" ratings on Sprint's stock, noting that the
> company is in the midst of a turnaround that may have to get worse
> before it gets better. In the meantime, Sprint's subscriber defections
> should benefit Verizon Wireless and AT&T Inc. -- though the shares of
> both companies fell on Friday.
>
> Sprint's shares plunged $2.91, or 25.2 percent, to $8.66 in afternoon
> trading. The stock has lost nearly 35 percent of its value since the
> start of the year. Earlier Friday, shares hit $8.15, their lowest
> level since 2002.
>
> Verizon's shares fell $1.91, or 4.7 percent, to $39. AT&T's shares
> fell $1.29, or 3.5 percent, to $36.01.
HA HA HA, shoulda went with GSM...those Lucifer radio cards should be
good for some gold and silver scrap value....JG |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Dec 14, 2007 Posts: 672
|
(Msg. 3) Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 5:19 pm
Post subject: Re: SPRINT = a "meltdown," a "miserable performance" and a "disaster" [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Jan 18, 8:00 pm, John Navas <spamfilt....DeleteThis@navasgroup.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:46:08 -0800 (PST), jgrov....DeleteThis@hotmail.com wrote in
> <6da5f0e5-6cf7-498b-aefc-a73189a88....DeleteThis@d70g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>:
>
> >On Jan 18, 6:38 pm, 4phun <vic.hea....DeleteThis@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Verizon's shares fell $1.91, or 4.7 percent, to $39. AT&T's shares
> >> fell $1.29, or 3.5 percent, to $36.01.
> >HA HA HA, shoulda went with GSM...those Lucifer radio cards should be
> >good for some gold and silver scrap value....JG
>
> Yep. CDMA has been in serious decline, and this will tend to accelerate
> the process, leaving Verizon increasingly isolated on a shrinking CDMA
> island, probably why Verizon shares dropped much more than AT&T shares.
> The bet by AT&T on GSM and 3G looks has been paying off well, and
> beating out Verizon for the iPhone has made it the strongest player in
> the U.S. market.
>
> --
> Best regards, FAQ FOR AT&T (CINGULAR) WIRELESS:
> John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/AT&T_Wireless_FAQ>
John in looking over the financial news related to this Sprint news I
saw one wit called CDMA the beta max of Wireless and another said
Sprint should consider switching to GSM. Apparently there is a
Canadian Telco considering rolling out GSM this year and abandoning
their CDMA network. The bottom line, the global standard is GSM.
John, I also saw an interesting news story from CNET VIDEO NEWS today
that mentioned the current tweaking by Google for the iPhone now had
the same Google search data on the iPhone which was using GSM EDGE
loading and displaying just as fast as a PC hooked up to broadband.
The iPhone is one powerful little instrument that has captured the
imagination of best minds in the industry! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: May 22, 2006 Posts: 3
|
(Msg. 4) Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 5:22 pm
Post subject: Re: SPRINT = a "meltdown," a "miserable performance" and a "disaster" [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Jan 18, 7:14 pm, Dennis Ferguson <dcfergu....TakeThisOut@pacbell.net> wrote:
> On 2008-01-19, John Navas <spamfilt....TakeThisOut@navasgroup.com> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:46:08 -0800 (PST), jgrov....TakeThisOut@hotmail.com wrote in
> ><6da5f0e5-6cf7-498b-aefc-a73189a88....TakeThisOut@d70g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>:
>
> >>On Jan 18, 6:38 pm, 4phun <vic.hea....TakeThisOut@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>> Verizon's shares fell $1.91, or 4.7 percent, to $39. AT&T's shares
> >>> fell $1.29, or 3.5 percent, to $36.01.
>
> >>HA HA HA, shoulda went with GSM...those Lucifer radio cards should be
> >>good for some gold and silver scrap value....JG
>
> > Yep. CDMA has been in serious decline, and this will tend to accelerate
> > the process, leaving Verizon increasingly isolated on a shrinking CDMA
> > island, probably why Verizon shares dropped much more than AT&T shares.
>
> ?? Over the past 52 weeks Verizon shares are up 5%, AT&T up 3% and Sprint
> down 50%. The S&P is down 7%.
>
> Sprint and Verizon don't look like the ones which are closely correlated
> to me.
>
> Dennis Ferguson
A down day for all:
Symbol Time Trade Change % Chg
S 4:00PM ET 8.70 Down 2.87 Down 24.81%
T 4:01PM ET 36.11 Down 1.19 Down 3.19%
VZ 4:00PM ET 39.09 Down 1.82 Down 4.45% |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Apr 23, 2008 Posts: 712
|
(Msg. 5) Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2008 12:18 am
Post subject: Re: SPRINT = a "meltdown," a "miserable performance" and a "disaster" - shares [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: alt>cellular>attws, others (more info?)
|
|
|
At 19 Jan 2008 01:00:33 +0000 John Navas wrote:
> Yep. CDMA has been in serious decline, and this will tend to accelerate
> the process, leaving Verizon increasingly isolated on a shrinking CDMA
> island, probably why Verizon shares dropped much more than AT&T shares.
But Sprint's problems have nothing to do with being CDMA. If CDMA is
"declining," it's because Sprint is hemmoraging customers- not the other
way around. If Sprint was GSM, GSM would've lost 650,000 customers instead.
> The bet by AT&T on GSM and 3G looks has been paying off well, and
> beating out Verizon for the iPhone has made it the strongest player in
> the U.S. market.
Which has nothing to do with GSM (or CDMA), either. Other than a few savvy
customers that travel internationally, I doubt 9 out of 10 cellular
customers know or care what technology their carrier uses. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jul 12, 2007 Posts: 617
|
(Msg. 6) Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2008 1:00 am
Post subject: Re: SPRINT = a "meltdown," a "miserable performance" and a "disaster" - shares plunged 25.2 percent [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:46:08 -0800 (PST), jgrove24.TakeThisOut@hotmail.com wrote in
<6da5f0e5-6cf7-498b-aefc-a73189a886f7.TakeThisOut@d70g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>:
>On Jan 18, 6:38 pm, 4phun <vic.hea....TakeThisOut@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Verizon's shares fell $1.91, or 4.7 percent, to $39. AT&T's shares
>> fell $1.29, or 3.5 percent, to $36.01.
>HA HA HA, shoulda went with GSM...those Lucifer radio cards should be
>good for some gold and silver scrap value....JG
Yep. CDMA has been in serious decline, and this will tend to accelerate
the process, leaving Verizon increasingly isolated on a shrinking CDMA
island, probably why Verizon shares dropped much more than AT&T shares.
The bet by AT&T on GSM and 3G looks has been paying off well, and
beating out Verizon for the iPhone has made it the strongest player in
the U.S. market.
--
Best regards, FAQ FOR AT&T (CINGULAR) WIRELESS:
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/AT&T_Wireless_FAQ> |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Dec 14, 2007 Posts: 8
|
(Msg. 7) Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2008 1:00 am
Post subject: Re: SPRINT = a "meltdown," a "miserable performance" and a "disaster" - shares plunged 25.2 percent [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
John, up to your old tricks again I see......
Let me give you a hint...... then do your homework.
N E X T E L
is where most of the problems are - (which isn't "CDMA")......
"John Navas" <spamfilter1 DeleteThis @navasgroup.com> wrote in message
news:pii2p3p5e7eg675nop6o6r5rnk66auvfrr@4ax.com...
>
> Yep. CDMA has been in serious decline, and this will tend to accelerate
> the process, leaving Verizon increasingly isolated on a shrinking CDMA
> island, probably why Verizon shares dropped much more than AT&T shares.
> The bet by AT&T on GSM and 3G looks has been paying off well, and
> beating out Verizon for the iPhone has made it the strongest player in
> the U.S. market.
>
> --
> Best regards, FAQ FOR AT&T (CINGULAR) WIRELESS:
> John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/AT&T_Wireless_FAQ> |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Nov 14, 2006 Posts: 187
|
(Msg. 8) Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2008 1:14 am
Post subject: Re: SPRINT = a "meltdown," a "miserable performance" and a "disaster" - shares plunged 25.2 percent [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On 2008-01-19, John Navas <spamfilter1.RemoveThis@navasgroup.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:46:08 -0800 (PST), jgrove24.RemoveThis@hotmail.com wrote in
><6da5f0e5-6cf7-498b-aefc-a73189a886f7.RemoveThis@d70g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>:
>
>>On Jan 18, 6:38 pm, 4phun <vic.hea....RemoveThis@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> Verizon's shares fell $1.91, or 4.7 percent, to $39. AT&T's shares
>>> fell $1.29, or 3.5 percent, to $36.01.
>
>>HA HA HA, shoulda went with GSM...those Lucifer radio cards should be
>>good for some gold and silver scrap value....JG
>
> Yep. CDMA has been in serious decline, and this will tend to accelerate
> the process, leaving Verizon increasingly isolated on a shrinking CDMA
> island, probably why Verizon shares dropped much more than AT&T shares.
?? Over the past 52 weeks Verizon shares are up 5%, AT&T up 3% and Sprint
down 50%. The S&P is down 7%.
Sprint and Verizon don't look like the ones which are closely correlated
to me.
Dennis Ferguson |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jan 18, 2006 Posts: 1035
|
(Msg. 9) Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2008 1:14 am
Post subject: Re: SPRINT = a "meltdown," a "miserable performance" and a "disaster" [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Dennis Ferguson wrote:
> On 2008-01-19, John Navas <spamfilter1.TakeThisOut@navasgroup.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:46:08 -0800 (PST), jgrove24.TakeThisOut@hotmail.com wrote in
>> <6da5f0e5-6cf7-498b-aefc-a73189a886f7.TakeThisOut@d70g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>:
>>
>>> On Jan 18, 6:38 pm, 4phun <vic.hea....TakeThisOut@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Verizon's shares fell $1.91, or 4.7 percent, to $39. AT&T's shares
>>>> fell $1.29, or 3.5 percent, to $36.01.
>>> HA HA HA, shoulda went with GSM...those Lucifer radio cards should be
>>> good for some gold and silver scrap value....JG
>> Yep. CDMA has been in serious decline, and this will tend to accelerate
>> the process, leaving Verizon increasingly isolated on a shrinking CDMA
>> island, probably why Verizon shares dropped much more than AT&T shares.
>
> ?? Over the past 52 weeks Verizon shares are up 5%, AT&T up 3% and Sprint
> down 50%. The S&P is down 7%.
>
> Sprint and Verizon don't look like the ones which are closely correlated
> to me.
Even with the Sprint subscriber losses, CDMA remains the dominant system
in North America, with well over 50% of subscribers. 2007 saw big
increases in CDMA penetration in the U.S.. CDMA is also gaining ground
in Asia, because carriers like the fact that you can have the same
coverage with 40% fewer cell sites, and the fact that CDMA has much
higher capacity per Mhz than GSM.
In Australia, a judge granted an emergency order delaying the CDMA shut
down because "Next G" could not provide the rural coverage of CDMA. Hey,
maybe someone can do that for AMPS in the U.S.!
Of course remember than for data, it's all CDMA, whether it's W-CDMA or
CDMA-2000. The future is indeed bright for CDMA! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jul 14, 2005 Posts: 10
|
(Msg. 10) Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2008 1:14 am
Post subject: Re: SPRINT = a "meltdown," a "miserable performance" and a "disaster" - shares plunged 25.2 percent [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
In article <47916887$0$84203$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>, SMS
<scharf.steven.RemoveThis@geemail.com> wrote:
> Of course remember than for data, it's all CDMA, whether it's W-CDMA or
> CDMA-2000. The future is indeed bright for CDMA!
I gather you have not heard of LTE the 4G upgrade.
--
Charles |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jul 12, 2007 Posts: 617
|
(Msg. 11) Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2008 1:48 am
Post subject: Re: SPRINT = a "meltdown," a "miserable performance" and a "disaster" - shares plunged 25.2 percent [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 01:14:10 GMT, Dennis Ferguson
<dcferguson DeleteThis @pacbell.net> wrote in
<slrnfp2jn1.4m.dcferguson DeleteThis @akit-ferguson.com>:
>On 2008-01-19, John Navas <spamfilter1 DeleteThis @navasgroup.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:46:08 -0800 (PST), jgrove24 DeleteThis @hotmail.com wrote in
>><6da5f0e5-6cf7-498b-aefc-a73189a886f7 DeleteThis @d70g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>:
>>
>>>On Jan 18, 6:38 pm, 4phun <vic.hea... DeleteThis @gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> Verizon's shares fell $1.91, or 4.7 percent, to $39. AT&T's shares
>>>> fell $1.29, or 3.5 percent, to $36.01.
>>
>>>HA HA HA, shoulda went with GSM...those Lucifer radio cards should be
>>>good for some gold and silver scrap value....JG
>>
>> Yep. CDMA has been in serious decline, and this will tend to accelerate
>> the process, leaving Verizon increasingly isolated on a shrinking CDMA
>> island, probably why Verizon shares dropped much more than AT&T shares.
>
>?? Over the past 52 weeks Verizon shares are up 5%, AT&T up 3% and Sprint
>down 50%. The S&P is down 7%.
>
>Sprint and Verizon don't look like the ones which are closely correlated
>to me.
I'm talking only about the drops today on the Sprint news. Analysts
believe the fall in AT&T and Verizon reflect a likely tough year in 2008
for cellular carriers. The greater fall in Verizon presumably means a
tougher outlook than for AT&T.
--
Best regards, FAQ FOR AT&T (CINGULAR) WIRELESS:
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/AT&T_Wireless_FAQ> |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jul 12, 2007 Posts: 617
|
(Msg. 12) Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2008 3:26 am
Post subject: Re: SPRINT = a "meltdown," a "miserable performance" and a "disaster" - shares plunged 25.2 percent [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 19:05:25 -0800, SMS <scharf.steven.DeleteThis@geemail.com>
wrote in <47916887$0$84203$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>:
>Of course remember than for data, it's all CDMA, whether it's W-CDMA or
>CDMA-2000. The future is indeed bright for CDMA!
Nope. CMDA-2000 and W-CDMA are totally different.
--
Best regards, FAQ FOR AT&T (CINGULAR) WIRELESS:
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/AT&T_Wireless_FAQ> |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jun 03, 2005 Posts: 401
|
(Msg. 13) Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2008 5:28 am
Post subject: Re: SPRINT = a "meltdown," a "miserable performance" and a "disaster" - shares plunged 25.2 percent [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
["Followup-To:" header set to alt.cellular.verizon.]
On 2008-01-19, John Navas <spamfilter1.RemoveThis@navasgroup.com> wrote:
> Yep. CDMA has been in serious decline
Were you ever a Sprint customer? I was, 2000-2005 for my wife's phone
and 2004-2005 for both phones. The biggest problem at Sprint wasn't the
network.
--
Steve Sobol, Victorville, CA PGP:0xE3AE35ED www.SteveSobol.com
Geek-for-hire. Details: http://www.linkedin.com/in/stevesobol |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Nov 14, 2006 Posts: 187
|
(Msg. 14) Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:53 am
Post subject: Re: SPRINT = a "meltdown," a "miserable performance" and a "disaster" - shares plunged 25.2 percent [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On 2008-01-19, SMS <scharf.steven.DeleteThis@geemail.com> wrote:
> Even with the Sprint subscriber losses, CDMA remains the dominant system
> in North America, with well over 50% of subscribers.
Unless my math is really screwed up that statistic is just wrong. Where
did it come from?
Dennis Ferguson |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jan 18, 2006 Posts: 1035
|
(Msg. 15) Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2008 7:30 am
Post subject: Re: SPRINT = a "meltdown," a "miserable performance" and a "disaster" [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Dennis Ferguson wrote:
> On 2008-01-19, SMS <scharf.steven RemoveThis @geemail.com> wrote:
>> Even with the Sprint subscriber losses, CDMA remains the dominant system
>> in North America, with well over 50% of subscribers.
>
> Unless my math is really screwed up that statistic is just wrong. Where
> did it come from?
>
> Dennis Ferguson
It was in an article last year. They added up the subscribers from the
major carriers for each technology, Verizon, Sprint, Alltel, AT&T,
T-Mobile, then divided by the total number of customers. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
|
|
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|