|
Next: mac mini (intel) power adaptor
|
| Author |
Message |
External

Since: Dec 28, 2006 Posts: 630
|
(Msg. 16) Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 9:07 pm
Post subject: Re: A good encryptor for old Mac OS X 10.2.8? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: comp>sys>mac>apps, others (more info?)
|
|
|
On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 18:56:49 -0600, Howard Brazee <howard.TakeThisOut@brazee.net>
wrote:
>
>I'm way to ignorant here.
Yuck. I'm way "too" ignorant here. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Feb 07, 2006 Posts: 92
|
(Msg. 17) Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 9:32 pm
Post subject: Re: A good encryptor for old Mac OS X 10.2.8? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On 2008-06-17 21:02:04 +0100, Howard Brazee <howard.RemoveThis@brazee.net> said:
> On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 20:21:56 +0100, Chris Ridd <chrisridd.RemoveThis@mac.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Sparse bundles are a Leopard-specific format of disk image. A sparse
>> bundle is a folder containing multiple files (bands) which when put
>> together contain all the disk image data. The point is, when you just
>> update a bit of the whole disk image you tend to just end up changing
>> one of the bands. Thus Time Machine only needs to back up one of the
>> bands.
>
> So if I have my encrypted dmg file, I can tell Time Machine to go
> ahead and back it up, and it will automatically not fill up every time
> I change a file within it? Nothing for me to do?
Try it and see?
Cheers,
Chris |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jun 17, 2008 Posts: 142
|
(Msg. 18) Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 11:01 pm
Post subject: Re: A good encryptor for old Mac OS X 10.2.8? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
In comp.sys.mac.system Howard Brazee <howard.RemoveThis@brazee.net> wrote:
> So if I have my encrypted dmg file, I can tell Time Machine to go
> ahead and back it up, and it will automatically not fill up every time
> I change a file within it? Nothing for me to do?
If your image is a sparse *bundle*, then yes.
I have a sparse bundle that is 1.27GB in size. Inside are 87 or so
bands (files) of 16MB each. If I add another 10MB of data to the
image, just one of those bands gets modified, and/or one more band gets
created. The rest of the bands remain intact. So the next time Time
Machine runs, it only needs to add the changed and/or new bands to the
TM backup disk. If this were a regular disk image, TM would add the
whole 1.27GB image file over again.
You should be able to convert your regular sparse image to a sparse
bundle with Disk Utility's Images -> Convert menu item. Or, create a
new empty sparse bundle, move your files to it, and delete your old
image.
--
K.
Lang may your lum reek. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Dec 28, 2006 Posts: 630
|
(Msg. 19) Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 11:01 pm
Post subject: Re: A good encryptor for old Mac OS X 10.2.8? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 23:01:58 GMT, me.TakeThisOut@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) wrote:
>In comp.sys.mac.system Howard Brazee <howard.TakeThisOut@brazee.net> wrote:
>> So if I have my encrypted dmg file, I can tell Time Machine to go
>> ahead and back it up, and it will automatically not fill up every time
>> I change a file within it? Nothing for me to do?
>
>If your image is a sparse *bundle*, then yes.
>
>I have a sparse bundle that is 1.27GB in size. Inside are 87 or so
>bands (files) of 16MB each. If I add another 10MB of data to the
>image, just one of those bands gets modified, and/or one more band gets
>created. The rest of the bands remain intact. So the next time Time
>Machine runs, it only needs to add the changed and/or new bands to the
>TM backup disk. If this were a regular disk image, TM would add the
>whole 1.27GB image file over again.
>
>You should be able to convert your regular sparse image to a sparse
>bundle with Disk Utility's Images -> Convert menu item. Or, create a
>new empty sparse bundle, move your files to it, and delete your old
>image.
Get Info didn't tell me anything about "sparse", so I'm guessing my
..dmg file is neither. I never heard of that word with regards to OS
X before this thread. I did look up "sparse" in _Mac OS X: The
Missing Manual_, and see that I could have created it with either
option. I suspect I did so with neither option (or else I'd see it in
Get Info).
It doesn't explain when I would want a sparse image, a sparse bundle
disk image, or just a read/write disk image. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Apr 04, 2006 Posts: 271
|
(Msg. 20) Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 1:31 am
Post subject: Re: A good encryptor for old Mac OS X 10.2.8? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Ant <ANTant.RemoveThis@zimage.com> wrote:
> On 6/16/2008 11:01 PM PT, Doug Anderson typed:
>
> >>>> Is that on current HDD or do I have to make new partitions?
> >>> You can save disk images anywhere you want. A disk image is simply a
> >>> file, that mounts a volume as a virtual disk when you open it.
> >> I use an encrypted one on my portable Macs to carry around sensitive
> >> info like credit card numbers. Make sure you use a strong password!
> >
> > Yes. You can store it in the encrypted disk image in case you forget
> > it.
>
> Sweet. I will check it out later. I assume newer Mac OS X is backward
> compatible with it too.
Doug was being facetious, but never mind  Encrypted disk images made
in 10.2.8 will work just fine in any later version of OSX.
Regards,
Jamie Kahn Genet
--
If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jun 24, 2008 Posts: 28
|
(Msg. 21) Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 1:52 am
Post subject: Re: A good encryptor for old Mac OS X 10.2.8? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
In article <v9ng54thvm082vng3bj7fb4mtgvslte661.TakeThisOut@4ax.com>,
Howard Brazee <howard.TakeThisOut@brazee.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 21:07:08 GMT, Tom Stiller <tomstiller.TakeThisOut@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
> >> So if I have my encrypted dmg file, I can tell Time Machine to go
> >> ahead and back it up, and it will automatically not fill up every time
> >> I change a file within it? Nothing for me to do?
> >
> >You *did* notice the distinction beteen sparse images and sparse
> >bundles, right?
>
> I'm way to ignorant here.
If you perform "Get Info" on the file in question, it will display the
extension which will probably be either "sparsebundle" or "dmg".
--
Tom Stiller
PGP fingerprint = 5108 DDB2 9761 EDE5 E7E3 7BDA 71ED 6496 99C0 C7CF |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Feb 07, 2006 Posts: 92
|
(Msg. 22) Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 7:20 am
Post subject: Re: A good encryptor for old Mac OS X 10.2.8? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On 2008-06-18 02:04:10 +0100, Howard Brazee <howard.DeleteThis@brazee.net> said:
> On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 23:01:58 GMT, me.DeleteThis@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) wrote:
>
>> In comp.sys.mac.system Howard Brazee <howard.DeleteThis@brazee.net> wrote:
>>> So if I have my encrypted dmg file, I can tell Time Machine to go
>>> ahead and back it up, and it will automatically not fill up every time
>>> I change a file within it? Nothing for me to do?
>>
>> If your image is a sparse *bundle*, then yes.
>>
>> I have a sparse bundle that is 1.27GB in size. Inside are 87 or so
>> bands (files) of 16MB each. If I add another 10MB of data to the
>> image, just one of those bands gets modified, and/or one more band gets
>> created. The rest of the bands remain intact. So the next time Time
>> Machine runs, it only needs to add the changed and/or new bands to the
>> TM backup disk. If this were a regular disk image, TM would add the
>> whole 1.27GB image file over again.
>>
>> You should be able to convert your regular sparse image to a sparse
>> bundle with Disk Utility's Images -> Convert menu item. Or, create a
>> new empty sparse bundle, move your files to it, and delete your old
>> image.
>
> Get Info didn't tell me anything about "sparse", so I'm guessing my
> .dmg file is neither. I never heard of that word with regards to OS
> X before this thread. I did look up "sparse" in _Mac OS X: The
> Missing Manual_, and see that I could have created it with either
> option. I suspect I did so with neither option (or else I'd see it in
> Get Info).
Sparse bundles were introduced in Leopard, so old books won't mention them.
Cheers,
Chris |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Dec 28, 2006 Posts: 630
|
(Msg. 23) Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 7:20 am
Post subject: Re: A good encryptor for old Mac OS X 10.2.8? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 07:20:43 +0100, Chris Ridd <chrisridd.RemoveThis@mac.com>
wrote:
>> Get Info didn't tell me anything about "sparse", so I'm guessing my
>> .dmg file is neither. I never heard of that word with regards to OS
>> X before this thread. I did look up "sparse" in _Mac OS X: The
>> Missing Manual_, and see that I could have created it with either
>> option. I suspect I did so with neither option (or else I'd see it in
>> Get Info).
>
>Sparse bundles were introduced in Leopard, so old books won't mention them.
I suspect that's why it looked like an add-on to the Leopard Edition
book I have. The author probably has already expanded it (at his
leisure) for the next edition of the book. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Aug 24, 2005 Posts: 125
|
(Msg. 24) Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 9:40 pm
Post subject: Re: A good encryptor for old Mac OS X 10.2.8? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On 16/06/2008, ANTant.RemoveThis@zimage.com wrote something.
Just a quick heads-up that this message was crossposted between
comp.sys.mac.apps,
comp.sys.mac.hardware.misc,
comp.sys.mac.hardware.storage,
comp.sys.mac.misc,
comp.sys.mac.system
Crossposting inside the c.s.m.* hierarchy is forbidden by the hierarchy
charter. Should you choose to reply, please make sure your response is on-
charter for all the groups you post it to. Thanks for your help.
Simon.
--
http://www.hearsay.demon.co.uk |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jun 19, 2008 Posts: 12
|
(Msg. 25) Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2008 1:23 am
Post subject: Re: A good encryptor for old Mac OS X 10.2.8? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
In comp.sys.mac.apps Simon Slavin <slavins.delete.these.four.words RemoveThis @hearsay.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> On 16/06/2008, ANTant RemoveThis @zimage.com wrote something.
>
> Just a quick heads-up that this message was crossposted between
>
> comp.sys.mac.apps,
> comp.sys.mac.hardware.misc,
> comp.sys.mac.hardware.storage,
> comp.sys.mac.misc,
> comp.sys.mac.system
>
> Crossposting inside the c.s.m.* hierarchy is forbidden by the hierarchy
> charter. Should you choose to reply, please make sure your response is on-
> charter for all the groups you post it to. Thanks for your help.
Sorry about that. I will post a new one to each group individually next
time. I just made another new cross-post a few minutes ago.
--
"We are anthill men upon an anthill world." --Ray Bradbury
/\___/\
/ /\ /\ \ Phillip (Ant) @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site)
| |o o| | Ant's Quality Foraged Links (AQFL): http://aqfl.net
\ _ / Please remove ANT if replying by e-mail.
( ) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Aug 30, 2005 Posts: 1346
|
(Msg. 26) Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2008 1:23 am
Post subject: Re: A good encryptor for old Mac OS X 10.2.8? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Imported from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
This message is not archived |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Dec 28, 2006 Posts: 630
|
(Msg. 27) Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 7:12 am
Post subject: Re: A good encryptor for old Mac OS X 10.2.8? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 17:17:11 GMT, me RemoveThis @home.spamsucks.ca (Király) wrote:
>You would benefit from using a sparse bundle instead of a sparse image.
>An item added to a sparse bundle will tend to change only a few of the
>embedded bands. When backing up with TM, only the changed bands will be
>added; not the whole thing.
I created a sparse bundle, and thought I made it encrypted - but
apparently I messed up. So I'm trying to find how to turn on
encryption for it without success. Maybe I'll have to create another
one, and copy everything over. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
| Related Topics: | Problem with SATA drive in G5s - Hi, A few months ago a friend successfully installed a second SATA drive (160Gb) into his G5. This week he bought another SATA drive (400Gb) to replace the 160 Gb drive, which he moved to become the second drive in another G5 where again it worked..
CD Burning with Toast 5.2, OS 9.2.2 - Mac G4 tower, internal Matshita CD burner that came with it, OS 9.2, Toast 5.2. Often, when I'm trying to burn a CD, Toast freezes at the end of the burning process and locks up the Mac, requiring me to restart the Mac. The resulting CD is always title...
Retrospect 6.0.212: Problem switching to blank media. - Hello, I've posted about this problem before & was advised to update to the latest version. I have now updated to version 6.0.212 but the problem persists, I think the solution must lie in a configuration setting somewhere but I can't find where ...
Internal SCSI Problem - I'm in the process of getting a Quadra 700 running. However, the hard drive is not being recognized. I confirmed the hard drive is good in a different computer. The Quadra will boot from a floppy, but the Apple System installers will not recognize....
Spring cleaning -- help me out! - I still have a pile of "Spring (er, Summer) cleaning" computer gear available. No reasonable offer refused. http://s90697863.onlinehome.us/eBay/misc/ForSale.html [NOTE: While this URL happens to be in my "ebay" folder, this ge... |
|
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You can edit your posts in this forum You can delete your posts in this forum You can vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|