|
Next: [gentoo-user] unwanted packages
|
| Author |
Message |
External

Since: Aug 21, 2005 Posts: 33
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 8:10 am
Post subject: [gentoo-user] Depclean question Archived from groups: linux>gentoo>user (more info?)
|
|
|
In preparation for cleaning my world file, I ran emerge -p --depclean
world. It listed these packages to be removed:
app-crypt/gpgme
app-crypt/opencdk
app-text/rman
dev-libs/libtasn1
dev-libs/lzo
dev-python/pyxml
gnome-base/gail
net-libs/gnutls
net-libs/libsoup
perl-core/Storable
perl-core/Test-Simple
sys-devel/bc
virtual/x11
x11-apps/sessreg
x11-apps/ttmkfdir
x11-apps/xcursorgen
x11-apps/xdm
x11-apps/xdriinfo
x11-base/opengl-update
x11-libs/libFS
x11-libs/libXTrap
x11-libs/libXevie
x11-libs/libXprintAppUtil
x11-libs/libXprintUtil
x11-libs/libXvMC
x11-libs/liboldX
x11-themes/gentoo-xcursors
x11-themes/gnome-themes
x11-themes/gtk-engines
x11-themes/xcursor-themes
Obviously many, if not most of them are needed. Remove virtual/x11??????
I noticed that many of them are dependencies of virtual/x11 so I added
that to my world file, re-ran the --depclean and this time got only
about half the recommendations. Was adding virtual/x11 to my world file
the proper thing to do? Wonder why it wasn't there in the first place?
Tony
--
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
-- Benjamin Franklin
--
gentoo-user DeleteThis @gentoo.org mailing list |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Apr 04, 2006 Posts: 189
|
(Msg. 2) Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 8:50 am
Post subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Depclean question [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On 7/17/06, Anthony E. Caudel <acaudel.TakeThisOut@gt.rr.com> wrote:
> I noticed that many of them are dependencies of virtual/x11 so I added
> that to my world file, re-ran the --depclean and this time got only
> about half the recommendations. Was adding virtual/x11 to my world file
> the proper thing to do? Wonder why it wasn't there in the first place?
Probably not. Prior to modular-X, any package that depended on
anything X related would depend on virtual/x11, which originally could
be provided by xfree86 or x.org, but now just x.org.
As part of porting to modular-X, all (well, almost all) packages that
previously depended on virtual/x11 were updated to depend on _either_
virtual/x11, or the specific modular-X package[s] that they really
needed.
So the above depclean output means that none of those packages are in
your world file, and nothing in your world file depends directly or
indirectly on them, based on your current USE flags. Specifically,
nothing really depends on virtual/x11, because the dependancies are
satified by the various modular-X packages you have installed.
So the proper thing to do here is probably add the specific apps that
you actually care about and use to world.
-Richard
--
gentoo-user.TakeThisOut@gentoo.org mailing list |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Aug 21, 2005 Posts: 33
|
(Msg. 3) Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 9:40 am
Post subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Depclean question [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Richard Fish wrote:
> On 7/17/06, Anthony E. Caudel <acaudel RemoveThis @gt.rr.com> wrote:
>> I noticed that many of them are dependencies of virtual/x11 so I added
>> that to my world file, re-ran the --depclean and this time got only
>> about half the recommendations. Was adding virtual/x11 to my world file
>> the proper thing to do? Wonder why it wasn't there in the first place?
>
> Probably not. Prior to modular-X, any package that depended on
> anything X related would depend on virtual/x11, which originally could
> be provided by xfree86 or x.org, but now just x.org.
>
> As part of porting to modular-X, all (well, almost all) packages that
> previously depended on virtual/x11 were updated to depend on _either_
> virtual/x11, or the specific modular-X package[s] that they really
> needed.
>
> So the above depclean output means that none of those packages are in
> your world file, and nothing in your world file depends directly or
> indirectly on them, based on your current USE flags. Specifically,
> nothing really depends on virtual/x11, because the dependancies are
> satified by the various modular-X packages you have installed.
>
> So the proper thing to do here is probably add the specific apps that
> you actually care about and use to world.
>
> -Richard
Thats a little confusing because most of those are libraries and are
dependencies only of virtual/x11.
Tony
--
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
-- Benjamin Franklin
--
gentoo-user RemoveThis @gentoo.org mailing list |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
| Related Topics: | [gentoo-user] Depclean - Hi everybody, I'm trying to clean my install (one year old, so it's time to do it). I run an update, and run : emerge --newuse -Dvu world It installs a lot of update and so on and do everything ok. Afterwards, I run : revdep-rebuild It makes a lot of...
[gentoo-user] infinite battle between emerge --depclean an.. - The short story is that these two utilities will repeatedly remove and restore media-libs/gst-plugins-0.8.11. The long version follows. thanks in advance for any help. allan 1. Revdep-rebuild is initially happy ajglap gottlieb # revdep-rebuild..
[gentoo-user] Installing Gentoo - question - Hi folks, I followed; Gentoo Linux AMD64 Handbook http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-amd64.xml running "install-amd64-minimal-2006.0" CD to install Gentoo and encountered following problem; 1) Network connection ADSL broadband con...
[gentoo-user] ulimit question - Hi, How and where does Gentoo set the values I see in ulimit? Mostly I'm intersted in the 'max locked memory' value. mark@dragonfly ~ $ ulimit -a core file size (blocks, -c) 0 data seg size (kbytes, -d) unlimited file size ...
[gentoo-user] portage question - anyone know if you can compile something locally into your home directory using portage without being root? basically what I want to accomplish is like... ROOT=/home/lamotte/compile emerge openssh or ebuild /path/to/ebuild/ merge I would basically.... |
|
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|