Hottest Free Downloads - DownloadPipe.com Over 197,000 downloads! Bookmark Now!
DownloadPipe.com - New Downloads Every Minute
 SEARCH:
FAQFAQ    SearchSearch      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in

[gentoo-dev] package naming

 
   Linux (Home) -> Development RSS
Next:  [gentoo-dev] 2.6.16 and packages in conflict  
Author Message
Roy Marples

External


Since: Mar 20, 2006
Posts: 39



(Msg. 1) Posted: Mon Mar 20, 2006 6:50 pm
Post subject: [gentoo-dev] package naming
Archived from groups: linux>gentoo>dev (more info?)

Hi list.

I've been working on getting a Gentoo version of Debians resolvconf package
into portage. It's basically a re-write of the internals (which I don't like)
but the command line, setup and plugin system are 100% compatible (except for
the plugins which may need one line changing). As such, I've credited the
original author (Thomas Hood) and basically said this is a Gentoo re-write.
It's all good to go and all dhcp clients in portage and openvpn have patches
ready for its optional support. dhcp (dhclient) and ppp have already been
patched in portage.

Now, if the commandline is the same, should the package name be the same? If
so, what version number should I be using? It's currently just called
resolvconf-0.1

Thoughts?

BTW, baselayout-1.12 has always had a resolv.conf management system, but that
was coded on a per package basis - resolvconf allows each package to inject
dns setup without being reliant on baselayout. So baselayout-1.12.0_pre17
will be a fair bit lighter!

Thanks

--
Roy Marples <uberlord.RemoveThis@gentoo.org>
Gentoo Linux Developer
--
gentoo-dev.RemoveThis@gentoo.org mailing list
Back to top
Login to vote
Luca Barbato

External


Since: Dec 17, 2005
Posts: 84



(Msg. 2) Posted: Mon Mar 20, 2006 7:00 pm
Post subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] package naming [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> On Monday 20 March 2006 18:42, Roy Marples wrote:
>> Now, if the commandline is the same, should the package name be the same?
>> If so, what version number should I be using? It's currently just called
>> resolvconf-0.1
> I would say gentoo-resolvconf as it's a rewrite/fork.
>

why not having it implemented as eselect module? ^^;

lu
--
gentoo-dev.RemoveThis@gentoo.org mailing list
Back to top
Login to vote
Daniel Drake

External


Since: Jul 08, 2005
Posts: 93



(Msg. 3) Posted: Mon Mar 20, 2006 8:40 pm
Post subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] package naming [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Roy Marples wrote:
> Now, if the commandline is the same, should the package name be the same? If
> so, what version number should I be using? It's currently just called
> resolvconf-0.1

Definately change the name of the package (if not the script itself)
otherwise the Debian resolvconf author wouldn't be too happy.

resolvconf-gentoo would be a good choice

Daniel
--
gentoo-dev DeleteThis @gentoo.org mailing list
Back to top
Login to vote
Duncan

External


Since: Jul 19, 2005
Posts: 49



(Msg. 4) Posted: Mon Mar 20, 2006 8:40 pm
Post subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: package naming [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Chris Gianelloni posted <1142881216.32640.14.camel.RemoveThis@cgianelloni.nuvox.net>,
excerpted below, on Mon, 20 Mar 2006 14:00:15 -0500:

> I made a fork of hwdata for Gentoo's needs on the LiveCD and it is
> hwdata-gentoo (to match hwdata-knoppix and hwdata-morphix for their
> respective distributions). I think it makes more sense to keep the
> original package name first as it shows that it is a fork of that
> package.

Agreed if keeping the old name with a gentoo prefix/suffix is chosen.
However, nearly all Gentoo system tools are e<whatever> (not only portage
related either, as there's eselect), so I'd suggest eresolv.

Even if resolvconf-gentoo is chosen, I'd definitely recommend an eresolv
symlink, simply because doing so will allow it to be listed with
e<tab><tab>, if one forgets the name.

I recall back on Mandrake, reading the cooker discussion on their regret
at the naming convention they had chosen, <whatever>drake, for that very
reason -- no simple <prefix><tab><tab> method for listing all the Mandrake
system tools. Gentoo has it right with the e* precedent. I believe we
should continue to follow it.

--
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in
http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html


--
gentoo-dev.RemoveThis@gentoo.org mailing list
Back to top
Login to vote
Duncan

External


Since: Jul 19, 2005
Posts: 49



(Msg. 5) Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 3:20 pm
Post subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: package naming [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Chris Gianelloni posted <1142886036.32640.16.camel.DeleteThis@cgianelloni.nuvox.net>,
excerpted below, on Mon, 20 Mar 2006 15:20:35 -0500:

> On Mon, 2006-03-20 at 12:37 -0700, Duncan wrote:
>> Agreed if keeping the old name with a gentoo prefix/suffix is chosen.
>> However, nearly all Gentoo system tools are e<whatever> (not only portage
>> related either, as there's eselect), so I'd suggest eresolv.
>
> He was referring to the *package* name.

Uh... I think I was too sleepy or something. =8^)

Thanks.

--
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in
http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html


--
gentoo-dev.DeleteThis@gentoo.org mailing list
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
Related Topics:
[gentoo-dev] Need Help: Creating a new third party package - Hi, I am trying to create a gentoo package for some internal software. I followed several Howtos online and created the ebuild file for my package. But somehow ebuild always return me the same error over and over again: $ ebuild..

[gentoo-dev] Special request for maintainer / auditor of L.. - Let me preface this by saying that I am aware of the large amounts of bad blood existing between various Gentoo dev members and 'dma147'. I was not poking around under the hood of Gentoo when things transpired, so I am unaware of what happened... an...

[gentoo-dev] GLEP 19: Gentoo Stable Portage Tree -- ideas - Hi, I was recently reading this post [1] about gentoo's future, it mentioned a few items in relation to enterprise Gentoo, and that it currently needs features that just aren't available yet. One such example of a feature thats not available yet is..

[gentoo-dev] Gentoo Classes, a possible new method of spre.. - Hello, I am a frequenter of #gentoo-*, as many of you know :) Tonight, hanging out in #gentoo, I observed a huge amount of incorrect information once again.. tonight about profiles, cascading and all that jazz, which to be honest is fairly undocumented...

[gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for February - This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically the 2nd Thursday once a month), same bat channel (#gentoo-council @ irc.freenode.net) ! If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even vote on, let us know ! Simply..
       Linux (Home) -> Development All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Page 1 of 1

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Categories:
 Windows Forums
 Game Forums
  Linux Forums
 Mac Forums
 PDA Forums
 Mobile Forums
  Top  |  Store  |  RSS Feeds RSS  |  Data Feeds  |  Advertise  |  Submit  |  Bookmark  |  Newsletter  |  Contact