|
Next: Accepted ldap2zone 0.1-2 (source i386)
|
| Author |
Message |
External

Since: Jul 10, 2009 Posts: 3
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2009 7:25 am
Post subject: Remove control field Conflicts if the package is no longer in the repository Archived from groups: linux>debian>devel (more info?)
|
|
|
Hello Debian Developers,
I've recently uploaded (thanks to Bart Martens for sponsoring) my first
package and want to adopt the next one. It's cd-discid [1]. Its
debian/control file contains the Conflicts field. This package conflicts
with cdgrab (<< 0.7), which is no longer exists in the repository. So, I
have a question, may I remove Conflicts field safely?
1. http://packages.debian.org/sid/cd-discid
Thanks.
--
Timur
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST RemoveThis @lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster RemoveThis @lists.debian.org |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Nov 24, 2004 Posts: 1024
|
(Msg. 2) Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2009 10:25 am
Post subject: Re: Remove control field Conflicts if the package is no longer in the repository [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Wed, Aug 12 2009, Timur Birsh wrote:
> Hello Debian Developers,
>
> I've recently uploaded (thanks to Bart Martens for sponsoring) my first
> package and want to adopt the next one. It's cd-discid [1]. Its
> debian/control file contains the Conflicts field. This package conflicts
> with cdgrab (<< 0.7), which is no longer exists in the repository. So, I
> have a question, may I remove Conflicts field safely?
I think that as long as the package (cdgrab, in this case) is
not longer in stable, the conflicts line may be removed (we support
partial upgrades from stable, as far as is possible). In this case,
apparently cdgrab is not anywhere, so the conflicts line may go.
manoj
--
The IBM purchase of ROLM gives new meaning to the term "twisted
pair". Howard Anderson, "Yankee Group"
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta RemoveThis @debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST RemoveThis @lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster RemoveThis @lists.debian.org |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Oct 12, 2006 Posts: 5
|
(Msg. 3) Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2009 10:25 am
Post subject: Re: Remove control field Conflicts if the package is no longer in the repository [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 12 2009, Timur Birsh wrote:
>
>> Hello Debian Developers,
>>
>> I've recently uploaded (thanks to Bart Martens for sponsoring) my first
>> package and want to adopt the next one. It's cd-discid [1]. Its
>> debian/control file contains the Conflicts field. This package conflicts
>> with cdgrab (<< 0.7), which is no longer exists in the repository. So, I
>> have a question, may I remove Conflicts field safely?
>
> I think that as long as the package (cdgrab, in this case) is
> not longer in stable, the conflicts line may be removed (we support
> partial upgrades from stable, as far as is possible). In this case,
> apparently cdgrab is not anywhere, so the conflicts line may go.
Really it is still in the archive, but with an other name.
So I see two options:
- replace cdgrab (<< 0.7) with abcde (<< 0.7)
- remove the conflicts (because it is too old).
Notes:
The rename was done just before freezing potato, nearly 10 years ago.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/1999/11/msg00182.html
See also abcde changelog:
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/a/abcde/abcde_2.3.99.8...changel
ciao
cate
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST DeleteThis @lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster DeleteThis @lists.debian.org |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Oct 12, 2006 Posts: 5
|
(Msg. 4) Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2009 11:25 am
Post subject: Re: Remove control field Conflicts if the package is no longer in the repository [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
> Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 12 2009, Timur Birsh wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Debian Developers,
>>>
>>> I've recently uploaded (thanks to Bart Martens for sponsoring) my
>>> first package and want to adopt the next one. It's cd-discid [1]. Its
>>> debian/control file contains the Conflicts field. This package
>>> conflicts with cdgrab (<< 0.7), which is no longer exists in the
>>> repository. So, I have a question, may I remove Conflicts field safely?
>>
>> I think that as long as the package (cdgrab, in this case) is
>> not longer in stable, the conflicts line may be removed (we support
>> partial upgrades from stable, as far as is possible). In this case,
>> apparently cdgrab is not anywhere, so the conflicts line may go.
>
> Really it is still in the archive, but with an other name.
> So I see two options:
> - replace cdgrab (<< 0.7) with abcde (<< 0.7)
Oops. This is a stupid option because abcde (<< 0.7) never existed.
Sorry for the noise
ciao
cate
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST.RemoveThis@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster.RemoveThis@lists.debian.org |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jul 10, 2009 Posts: 3
|
(Msg. 5) Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2009 11:25 am
Post subject: Re: Remove control field Conflicts if the package is no longer in the repository [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Hi,
Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
>>> I think that as long as the package (cdgrab, in this case) is
>>> not longer in stable, the conflicts line may be removed (we support
>>> partial upgrades from stable, as far as is possible). In this case,
>>> apparently cdgrab is not anywhere, so the conflicts line may go.
>>
>> Really it is still in the archive, but with an other name.
>> So I see two options:
>> - replace cdgrab (<< 0.7) with abcde (<< 0.7)
>
> Oops. This is a stupid option because abcde (<< 0.7) never existed.
> Sorry for the noise
OK. Thanks a lot.
--
Timur
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST.RemoveThis@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster.RemoveThis@lists.debian.org |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
| Related Topics: | Bug#304521: ITP: wanna-build -- Database management for pa.. - Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2005-04-13 Severity: wishlist * Package name : wanna-build Version : 2005.04.13 Upstream Author : FTP Archives -- <ftpmaster@debian.org> * URL : deb http://db.debian.org/ debian-admin...
advice needed on handling network port conflicts - I've written a proxy server (approx) that is intended to be a drop-in replacement for apt-proxy. Sites that use apt-proxy are likely to have lots of http://foo:9999/... lines in the /etc/apt/sources.list files on multiple client machines. To avoid..
Bug#374029: Fixing inconsisten and unusefull Build-Depends.. - Package: debian-policy Severity: normal Hi, the current use and definition of Build-Depends/Conflicts[-Indep] in policy 7.6 don't match. Both use and definition also greatly reduce the usefullness of these fields. This issue has come up again and again...
Bug#419658: ITP: libmail-field-received-perl -- mostly RFC.. - Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Dominic Hargreaves <dom@earth.li> * Package name : libmail-field-received-perl Version : 0.24 Upstream Author : Adam Spiers <adam@spiers.net> * URL :..
Bug#374373: ITP: googleearth-package -- utility for automa.. - Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Wesley J. Landaker" <wjl@localhost> * Package name : googleearth-package Upstream Author : Wesley J. Landaker <wjl@icecavern.net> * URL : (native package) * License ... |
|
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|