FAQFAQ   SearchSearch      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log in/Register/PasswordLog in/Register/Password

[News] Microsoft OOXML: Fail

 
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
   Linux (Home) -> Advocacy RSS
Next:  Advocacy: [News] GNU/Linux Mainframes Good for the Environment  
Author Message
Roy Schestowitz

External


Since: Dec 13, 2004
Posts: 12960



(Msg. 1) Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 4:36 am
Post subject: [News] Microsoft OOXML: Fail
Archived from groups: comp>os>linux>advocacy (more info?)

Showdown in Geneva: OOXML Fails to Achieve Majority Approval at BRM

,----[ Quote ]
| Many, many, people around the world have tried very hard to make the OOXML
| adoption process work. It is very unfortunate that they were put to this
| predictably unsuccessful result through the self-interest of a single vendor
| taking advantage of a permissive process that was never intended to be abused
| in this fashion. It would be highly inappropriate to compound this error by
| approving a clearly unfinished specification in the voting period ahead. To
| paraphrase a former First Lady, it's time to "Just say No" to OOXML.
`----

http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=20080229055319727

OOXML Fails to Get Majority Approval at BRM - Updated 2Xs

,----[ Quote ]
| Andy Updegrove has the results in detail here, including a breakdown of the
| votes. Basically, there were too many proposed changes to be able to cover
| them in the BRM, so they tried a workaround, but the upshot is ... it's a
| mess. Oddly, despite the rules, Alex Brown, Updegrove reports, allowed non P
| countries to vote, but OOXML still couldn't get a majority of the delegations
| to back it at the BRM. Nor is it clear that allowing non P countries to vote
| is even legitimate. Now it's the 30-day voting period, but Updegrove asks, if
| they never could discuss all the issues, which is the purpose of a BRM,
| what's the basis for a vote? And with the vast majority either voting to
| abstain or even refusing to vote as a protest, I think one may conclude this
| proposal didn't belong on the fast track, and it isn't getting the kind of
| support you would have thought it might, given all the muscle that has gone
| into the push to get OOXML approved.
`----

http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20080229124919217

Bureaucracy swamps ISO meeting on Microsoft format

,----[ Quote ]
| Instead, the ballot resolution meeting became bogged down in bureaucracy as
| the delegates struggled with more than a thousand points of order, as well as
| the 6,000 pages of code that define Microsoft's Office Open XML (OOXML)
| format.
`----

http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSN2923321820080229

Weak ISO support for changes to Open XML throws shadow over final approval

,----[ Quote ]
| A committee of ISO members in Geneva may have approved the proposed changes
| to Microsoft's Office Open XML (OOXML) on Friday, but the document format's
| final approval remains far from certain.
`----

http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasi...rticleI

"If you flee the rules, you will be caught. And it will cost you dearly,"

                        -- Neelie Kroes (about Microsoft), February 27th, 2008


Related:

Microsoft's secretive standards orgs in Former Yugoslavia

,----[ Quote ]
| Croatian laws keep its national body's votes secret, so the only way for the
| Croatian public to find out how the process went would be if a board member
| illegally leaked information out of CSI. This is, of course, unlikely to
| happen. And the Serbian national standardization body is not officially
| formed, so those two votes were easy for Microsoft, and probably not only
| ones around the globe.      
`----

http://www.linuxworld.com/news/2007/092407-ooxml.html?page=1


Microsoft Tech Ed 2007: OpenXML

,----[ Quote ]
| He was asked "Why did Microsoft push OOXML through the "Fast Track" process
| instead of the standard ISO process? Wouldn't they get less resistance than
| faced now?"  
|
| His response was very frank: "Office is a USD$10 billion revenue generator
| for the company. When ODF was made an ISO standard, Microsoft had to react
| quickly as certain governments have procurement policies which prefer ISO
| standards. Ecma and OASIS are 'international standards', but ISO is the
| international 'Gold Standard'. Microsoft therefore had to rush this standard
| through. Its a simple matter of commercial interests!"    
`----            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

http://www.openmalaysiablog.com/2007/09/microsoft-tech-.html


http://picandocodigo.linuxuruguay.org/index.php/2007/08/29/uruguay-vot...i-al-oo


Evidence of Microsoft Influencing OOXML Votes in Nordic States

,----[ Quote ]
| "This is how a standard is bought," Bosson wrote later. "I left the meeting
| in protest - pissed off."
`----

http://www.betanews.com/article/Evidence_of_Microsoft_Influencing_OOXM...otes_in


http://www.dn.se/DNet/jsp/polopoly.jsp?d=147&a=686119


Microsoft Memo to Partners in Sweden Surfaces: Vote Yes for OOXML - Updated

,----[ Quote ]
| He acknowledges that the rules might need to be changed.
`----

http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20070829070630660


The OOXML Problem

,----[ Quote ]
| Another thing, by introducing a "new fancy" document format, MS can hold a
| tighter grip round existing customers and get more on the false pretence that
| they've "opened up".  
`----

http://phun-ky.net/2007/08/the-ooxml-problem


Rejecting OOXML

,----[ Quote ]
| All the CIOs say they want is XML documents; unfortunately they aren't as
| aware as Georg Greve, above, that Microsoft's implementation of XML is
| exceedingly half-hearted.  
`----

http://fussnotes.typepad.com/plexnex/2007/08/rejecting-ooxml.html
Back to top
Login to vote
[H]omer

External


Since: May 25, 2006
Posts: 631



(Msg. 2) Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 7:22 am
Post subject: Re: [News] Microsoft OOXML: Fail [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Roy Schestowitz wrote:

> ,----[ Quote ]
> | Alex Brown, Updegrove reports, allowed non P countries to vote,
> | but OOXML still couldn't get a majority of the delegations to back
> | it at the BRM. Nor is it clear that allowing non P countries to vote
> | is even legitimate.
[...]
> `----
>
> http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20080229124919217

Microsoft needs to give up ... now. It's just getting embarrassing.
Their desperation is as palpable as their motives.

--
K.
http://slated.org

..----
| 'When it comes to knowledge, "ownership" just doesn't make sense'
| ~ Cory Doctorow, The Guardian. http://tinyurl.com/22bgx8
`----

Fedora release 8 (Werewolf) on sky, running kernel 2.6.23.8-63.fc8
07:22:17 up 71 days, 4:58, 5 users, load average: 0.02, 0.04, 0.08
Back to top
Login to vote
Roy Schestowitz

External


Since: Dec 13, 2004
Posts: 12960



(Msg. 3) Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 10:08 am
Post subject: Re: [News] Microsoft OOXML: Fail [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

____/ [H]omer on Saturday 01 March 2008 07:22 : \____

> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>
>> ,----[ Quote ]
>> | Alex Brown, Updegrove reports, allowed non P countries to vote,
>> | but OOXML still couldn't get a majority of the delegations to back
>> | it at the BRM. Nor is it clear that allowing non P countries to vote
>> | is even legitimate.
> [...]
>> `----
>>
>> http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20080229124919217
>
> Microsoft needs to give up ... now. It's just getting embarrassing.
> Their desperation is as palpable as their motives.

They seem to have bribed India. I'll post about it in the afternoon.

--
~~ Best of wishes

"Pearly Gates and Em-Ballmer
One promises you heaven and the other prepares you for the grave. "

--Ray Noorda, Novell
Back to top
Login to vote
Jesper Lund Stocholm

External


Since: Mar 01, 2008
Posts: 16



(Msg. 4) Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 10:30 am
Post subject: Re: [News] Microsoft OOXML: Fail [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups RemoveThis @schestowitz.com> wrote in
news:2178870.qKlWx2Tgue@schestowitz.com:

> ____/ [H]omer on Saturday 01 March 2008 07:22 : \____
>
>> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>
>>> ,----[ Quote ]
>>> | Alex Brown, Updegrove reports, allowed non P countries to vote,
>>> | but OOXML still couldn't get a majority of the delegations to back
>>> | it at the BRM. Nor is it clear that allowing non P countries to
>>> | vote is even legitimate.
>> [...]
>>> `----
>>>
>>> http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20080229124919217
>>
>> Microsoft needs to give up ... now. It's just getting embarrassing.
>> Their desperation is as palpable as their motives.
>
> They seem to have bribed India. I'll post about it in the afternoon.

Ahem - did you miss how the Indians actually voted yesterday?

--
Jesper Lund Stocholm
http://idippedut.dk
Back to top
Login to vote
Roy Schestowitz

External


Since: Dec 13, 2004
Posts: 12960



(Msg. 5) Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 10:38 am
Post subject: Re: [News] Microsoft OOXML: Fail [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

____/ Jesper Lund Stocholm on Saturday 01 March 2008 10:30 : \____

> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups.TakeThisOut@schestowitz.com> wrote in
> news:2178870.qKlWx2Tgue@schestowitz.com:
>
>> ____/ [H]omer on Saturday 01 March 2008 07:22 : \____
>>
>>> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>
>>>> ,----[ Quote ]
>>>> | Alex Brown, Updegrove reports, allowed non P countries to vote,
>>>> | but OOXML still couldn't get a majority of the delegations to back
>>>> | it at the BRM. Nor is it clear that allowing non P countries to
>>>> | vote is even legitimate.
>>> [...]
>>>> `----
>>>>
>>>> http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20080229124919217
>>>
>>> Microsoft needs to give up ... now. It's just getting embarrassing.
>>> Their desperation is as palpable as their motives.
>>
>> They seem to have bribed India. I'll post about it in the afternoon.
>
> Ahem - did you miss how the Indians actually voted yesterday?

No.

--
~~ Best of wishes

Roy S. Schestowitz | "Double your drive space - delete Windows"
http://Schestowitz.com | GNU is Not UNIX | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
http://iuron.com - proposing a non-profit search engine
Back to top
Login to vote
Linonut

External


Since: Nov 28, 2007
Posts: 409



(Msg. 6) Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 11:14 am
Post subject: Re: [News] Microsoft OOXML: Fail [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

* Roy Schestowitz peremptorily fired off this memo:

> Showdown in Geneva: OOXML Fails to Achieve Majority Approval at BRM
>
> ,----[ Quote ]
>| Many, many, people around the world have tried very hard to make the OOXML
>| adoption process work. It is very unfortunate that they were put to this
>| predictably unsuccessful result through the self-interest of a single vendor
>| taking advantage of a permissive process that was never intended to be abused
>| in this fashion. It would be highly inappropriate to compound this error by
>| approving a clearly unfinished specification in the voting period ahead. To
>| paraphrase a former First Lady, it's time to "Just say No" to OOXML.
> `----
>
> http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=20080229055319727

There are two ways in which you may hear the results of the BRM
summarized by those that issue statements and press releases in the
days to come. Perhaps inevitably, they are diametrically opposed, as
has so often happened in the ODF - OOXML saga to date. Those results
are as follows:

98.4% of the OOXML Proposed Dispositions were approved by a three
to two majority at the BRM, validating OOXML

The OOXML Proposed Dispositions OOXML were overwhelmingly
rejected by the delegations in attendance at the BRM,
indicating the inability of OOXML to be adequately addressed
within the "Fast Track" process

In this blog entry, I will explain why the latter position is
the only supportable conclusion, and help you read the
various press releases and statements that may be made with
the benefit of the appropriate context.

All of the links Roy posted seem to (on a quick reading) show the
various spins on the result.

No doubt we'll get some more spin from the COLA inhabitants.

--
Just in terms of allocation of time resources, religion is not very
efficient. There's a lot more I could be doing on a Sunday morning.
-- Bill Gates
Back to top
Login to vote
Linonut

External


Since: Nov 28, 2007
Posts: 409



(Msg. 7) Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 11:19 am
Post subject: Re: [News] Microsoft OOXML: Fail [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

* [H]omer peremptorily fired off this memo:

> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>
>> ,----[ Quote ]
>> | Alex Brown, Updegrove reports, allowed non P countries to vote,
>> | but OOXML still couldn't get a majority of the delegations to back
>> | it at the BRM. Nor is it clear that allowing non P countries to vote
>> | is even legitimate.
> [...]
>> `----
>>
>> http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20080229124919217
>
> Microsoft needs to give up ... now. It's just getting embarrassing.
> Their desperation is as palpable as their motives.

Nah, not if they're still thinking long-term:

http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=20080229055319727

The better conclusion is that despite the good faith efforts of all
concerned and their willingness to see this process through to its
conclusion, it has proven to be impossible for as large and poorly
prepared a specification as this to be properly addressed via the
"Fast Track" process.

So their ram-rodding failed, and Microsoft can coast for a few
months/years more on their de facto Office monopoly.

And, who knows? Maybe they'll use the time to bring Office 2007+ and
OOXML into accord.

But, in the meantime, we can keep alert:

It is very unfortunate that they were put to this predictably
unsuccessful result through the self-interest of a single vendor
taking advantage of a permissive process that was never intended to
be abused in this fashion.

--
The best way to prepare [to be a programmer] is to write programs, and to
study great programs that other people have written. In my case, I went to
the garbage cans at the Computer Science Center and fished out listings of
their operating system.
-- Bill Gates
Back to top
Login to vote
Jesper Lund Stocholm

External


Since: Mar 01, 2008
Posts: 16



(Msg. 8) Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 3:33 pm
Post subject: Re: [News] Microsoft OOXML: Fail [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups DeleteThis @schestowitz.com> wrote in news:3515290.LKe7cgyNvA@schestowitz.com:

> ____/ Jesper Lund Stocholm on Saturday 01 March 2008 10:30 : \____
>
>> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups DeleteThis @schestowitz.com> wrote in
>>>> Microsoft needs to give up ... now. It's just getting embarrassing.
>>>> Their desperation is as palpable as their motives.
>>>
>>> They seem to have bribed India. I'll post about it in the afternoon.
>>
>> Ahem - did you miss how the Indians actually voted yesterday?
>
> No.

So could you please explain to me the correlation between the Indian vote
yesterday and Microsoft bribing them? According to a comment on Brian
Jones' blog [0] India disapproved 97.86% of the responses from ECMA.

[0]
http://blogs.msdn.com/brian_jones/archive/2008/02/29/brm-is-done-time-...sleep.a

--
Jesper Lund Stocholm
http://idippedut.dk
Back to top
Login to vote
Tony Drudge

External


Since: Feb 23, 2008
Posts: 18



(Msg. 9) Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 3:33 pm
Post subject: Re: [News] Microsoft OOXML: Fail [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Jesper Lund Stocholm" <jls2008.DeleteThis@lundstocholm.invalid> wrote in message
news:Xns9A54A86939947jlundstocholm@130.225.247.90...
> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups.DeleteThis@schestowitz.com> wrote in
> news:3515290.LKe7cgyNvA@schestowitz.com:
>
>> ____/ Jesper Lund Stocholm on Saturday 01 March 2008 10:30 : \____
>>
>>> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups.DeleteThis@schestowitz.com> wrote in
>>>>> Microsoft needs to give up ... now. It's just getting embarrassing.
>>>>> Their desperation is as palpable as their motives.
>>>>
>>>> They seem to have bribed India. I'll post about it in the afternoon.
>>>
>>> Ahem - did you miss how the Indians actually voted yesterday?
>>
>> No.
>
> So could you please explain to me the correlation between the Indian vote
> yesterday and Microsoft bribing them? According to a comment on Brian
> Jones' blog [0] India disapproved 97.86% of the responses from ECMA.
>
> [0]
> http://blogs.msdn.com/brian_jones/archive/2008/02/29/brm-is-done-time-...sleep.a
>

In case you haven't figured it out already, Roy Schestowitz is a
fruit-loop.

Anyone and everyone that doesn't agree 100% with his distorted point of
view is somehow bribed or paid by Microsoft. Facts be damned.

- Tony D.




--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
Back to top
Login to vote
Sinister Midget

External


Since: Oct 22, 2007
Posts: 55



(Msg. 10) Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 3:33 pm
Post subject: Re: [News] Microsoft OOXML: Fail [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On 2008-03-01, Jesper Lund Stocholm <jls2008.TakeThisOut@lundstocholm.invalid> claimed:
> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups.TakeThisOut@schestowitz.com> wrote in news:3515290.LKe7cgyNvA@schestowitz.com:
>
>> ____/ Jesper Lund Stocholm on Saturday 01 March 2008 10:30 : \____
>>
>>> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups.TakeThisOut@schestowitz.com> wrote in
>>>>> Microsoft needs to give up ... now. It's just getting embarrassing.
>>>>> Their desperation is as palpable as their motives.
>>>>
>>>> They seem to have bribed India. I'll post about it in the afternoon.
>>>
>>> Ahem - did you miss how the Indians actually voted yesterday?
>>
>> No.
>
> So could you please explain to me the correlation between the Indian vote
> yesterday and Microsoft bribing them? According to a comment on Brian
> Jones' blog [0] India disapproved 97.86% of the responses from ECMA.
>
> [0]
> http://blogs.msdn.com/brian_jones/archive/2008/02/29/brm-is-done-time-...sleep.a

Giving a bribe may be for "services rendered", but there's no absolute
assurance you bought the vote until the vote is cast. What is the
briber going to do to the bribeee, sue them for taking money and doing
nothing illegal?

Ask Hillary about her super-delegates if you don't want to take my word
for it.

--
A choice is always possible, even without any options.
Back to top
Login to vote
Rick

External


Since: May 13, 2005
Posts: 633



(Msg. 11) Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 4:08 pm
Post subject: Re: [News] Microsoft OOXML: Fail [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Sat, 01 Mar 2008 10:56:16 -0500, Tony Drudge wrote:

> "Jesper Lund Stocholm" <jls2008 DeleteThis @lundstocholm.invalid> wrote in message
> news:Xns9A54A86939947jlundstocholm@130.225.247.90...
>> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups DeleteThis @schestowitz.com> wrote in
>> news:3515290.LKe7cgyNvA@schestowitz.com:
>>
>>> ____/ Jesper Lund Stocholm on Saturday 01 March 2008 10:30 : \____
>>>
>>>> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups DeleteThis @schestowitz.com> wrote in
>>>>>> Microsoft needs to give up ... now. It's just getting embarrassing.
>>>>>> Their desperation is as palpable as their motives.
>>>>>
>>>>> They seem to have bribed India. I'll post about it in the afternoon.
>>>>
>>>> Ahem - did you miss how the Indians actually voted yesterday?
>>>
>>> No.
>>
>> So could you please explain to me the correlation between the Indian
>> vote yesterday and Microsoft bribing them? According to a comment on
>> Brian Jones' blog [0] India disapproved 97.86% of the responses from
>> ECMA.
>>
>> [0]
>> http://blogs.msdn.com/brian_jones/archive/2008/02/29/brm-is-done-time-
to-sleep.aspx?CommentPosted=true#commentmessage
>>
>>
> In case you haven't figured it out already, Roy Schestowitz is a
> fruit-loop.
>
> Anyone and everyone that doesn't agree 100% with his distorted point of
> view is somehow bribed or paid by Microsoft. Facts be damned.
>
> - Tony D.

Why do you care what Roy thinks?

--
Rick
Back to top
Login to vote
Roy Schestowitz

External


Since: Dec 13, 2004
Posts: 12960



(Msg. 12) Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 5:11 pm
Post subject: Re: [News] Microsoft OOXML: Fail [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

____/ Jesper Lund Stocholm on Saturday 01 March 2008 15:33 : \____

> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups.RemoveThis@schestowitz.com> wrote in
> news:3515290.LKe7cgyNvA@schestowitz.com:
>
>> ____/ Jesper Lund Stocholm on Saturday 01 March 2008 10:30 : \____
>>
>>> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups.RemoveThis@schestowitz.com> wrote in
>>>>> Microsoft needs to give up ... now. It's just getting embarrassing.
>>>>> Their desperation is as palpable as their motives.
>>>>
>>>> They seem to have bribed India. I'll post about it in the afternoon.
>>>
>>> Ahem - did you miss how the Indians actually voted yesterday?
>>
>> No.
>
> So could you please explain to me the correlation between the Indian vote
> yesterday and Microsoft bribing them? According to a comment on Brian
> Jones' blog [0] India disapproved 97.86% of the responses from ECMA.

An unsuccessful case of misconduct does not make it any less of a misconduct.

> [0]
> <snip link to buddy>

--
~~ Best of wishes

Roy S. Schestowitz | Every beginning must start somewhere
http://Schestowitz.com | GNU/Linux | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Swap: 1510068k total, 461256k used, 1048812k free, 68920k cached
http://iuron.com - next generation of search paradigms
Back to top
Login to vote
Tony Drudge

External


Since: Feb 23, 2008
Posts: 18



(Msg. 13) Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 5:11 pm
Post subject: Re: [News] Microsoft OOXML: Fail [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Roy Schestowitz" <newsgroups.DeleteThis@schestowitz.com> wrote in message
news:1713876.KhxXeN0Nff@schestowitz.com...
> ____/ Jesper Lund Stocholm on Saturday 01 March 2008 15:33 : \____
>
>> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups.DeleteThis@schestowitz.com> wrote in
>> news:3515290.LKe7cgyNvA@schestowitz.com:
>>
>>> ____/ Jesper Lund Stocholm on Saturday 01 March 2008 10:30 : \____
>>>
>>>> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups.DeleteThis@schestowitz.com> wrote in
>>>>>> Microsoft needs to give up ... now. It's just getting embarrassing.
>>>>>> Their desperation is as palpable as their motives.
>>>>>
>>>>> They seem to have bribed India. I'll post about it in the afternoon.
>>>>
>>>> Ahem - did you miss how the Indians actually voted yesterday?
>>>
>>> No.
>>
>> So could you please explain to me the correlation between the Indian
>> vote
>> yesterday and Microsoft bribing them? According to a comment on Brian
>> Jones' blog [0] India disapproved 97.86% of the responses from ECMA.
>
> An unsuccessful case of misconduct does not make it any less of a
> misconduct.

Your imaginary delusion of misconduct is still an imaginary delusion of
misconduct.





--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
Back to top
Login to vote
Moshe Goldfarb

External


Since: Feb 19, 2008
Posts: 400



(Msg. 14) Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 5:11 pm
Post subject: Re: [News] Microsoft OOXML: Fail [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Sat, 01 Mar 2008 17:11:56 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:

> ____/ Jesper Lund Stocholm on Saturday 01 March 2008 15:33 : \____
>
>> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups.TakeThisOut@schestowitz.com> wrote in
>> news:3515290.LKe7cgyNvA@schestowitz.com:
>>
>>> ____/ Jesper Lund Stocholm on Saturday 01 March 2008 10:30 : \____
>>>
>>>> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups.TakeThisOut@schestowitz.com> wrote in
>>>>>> Microsoft needs to give up ... now. It's just getting embarrassing.
>>>>>> Their desperation is as palpable as their motives.
>>>>>
>>>>> They seem to have bribed India. I'll post about it in the afternoon.
>>>>
>>>> Ahem - did you miss how the Indians actually voted yesterday?
>>>
>>> No.
>>
>> So could you please explain to me the correlation between the Indian vote
>> yesterday and Microsoft bribing them? According to a comment on Brian
>> Jones' blog [0] India disapproved 97.86% of the responses from ECMA.
>
> An unsuccessful case of misconduct does not make it any less of a misconduct.

So you don't have any proof.

I figured as much Roy Schestowitz.

You are a fake a fraud and a phony and you are being paid to SPAM and
spread FUD.


Moshe Goldfarb
Collector of soaps from around the globe.
Please visit The Hall of Linux Idiots:
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/
Back to top
Login to vote
Roy Schestowitz

External


Since: Dec 13, 2004
Posts: 12960



(Msg. 15) Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 5:13 pm
Post subject: Re: [News] Microsoft OOXML: Fail [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

____/ Linonut on Saturday 01 March 2008 16:14 : \____

> * Roy Schestowitz peremptorily fired off this memo:
>
>> Showdown in Geneva: OOXML Fails to Achieve Majority Approval at BRM
>>
>> ,----[ Quote ]
>>| Many, many, people around the world have tried very hard to make the OOXML
>>| adoption process work. It is very unfortunate that they were put to this
>>| predictably unsuccessful result through the self-interest of a single
>>| vendor taking advantage of a permissive process that was never intended to
>>| be abused
>>| in this fashion. It would be highly inappropriate to compound this error
>>| by
>>| approving a clearly unfinished specification in the voting period ahead.
>>| To paraphrase a former First Lady, it's time to "Just say No" to OOXML.
>> `----
>>
>>
http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=20080229055319727
>
> There are two ways in which you may hear the results of the BRM
> summarized by those that issue statements and press releases in the
> days to come. Perhaps inevitably, they are diametrically opposed, as
> has so often happened in the ODF - OOXML saga to date. Those results
> are as follows:
>
> 98.4% of the OOXML Proposed Dispositions were approved by a three
> to two majority at the BRM, validating OOXML
>
> The OOXML Proposed Dispositions OOXML were overwhelmingly
> rejected by the delegations in attendance at the BRM,
> indicating the inability of OOXML to be adequately addressed
> within the "Fast Track" process
>
> In this blog entry, I will explain why the latter position is
> the only supportable conclusion, and help you read the
> various press releases and statements that may be made with
> the benefit of the appropriate context.
>
> All of the links Roy posted seem to (on a quick reading) show the
> various spins on the result.
>
> No doubt we'll get some more spin from the COLA inhabitants.

Yes, I was going to post about it in a minute. They now change their tune.
Spin, spin, spin... but no ISO for the time being.

--
~~ Best of wishes

Roy S. Schestowitz | Every beginning must start somewhere
http://Schestowitz.com | GNU/Linux | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Swap: 1510068k total, 461256k used, 1048812k free, 68920k cached
http://iuron.com - next generation of search paradigms
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
       Linux (Home) -> Advocacy All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
Page 1 of 7

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Categories:
 Windows Forums
 Game Forums
  Linux Forums
 Mac Forums
 PDA Forums
 Mobile Forums
  Top  |  Store  |  RSS Feeds RSS  |  Data Feeds  |  Advertise  |  Submit  |  Bookmark  |  Newsletter  |  Contact