Hottest Free Downloads - DownloadPipe.com Over 197,000 downloads! Bookmark Now!
DownloadPipe.com - New Downloads Every Minute
 SEARCH:
FAQFAQ    SearchSearch      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in

Confused about the Glassfish packages

 
   Linux (Home) -> Java RSS
Next:  RFS: libenglab0.2 (second attempt)  
Author Message
David Goodenough

External


Since: Apr 11, 2008
Posts: 8



(Msg. 1) Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2008 2:30 pm
Post subject: Confused about the Glassfish packages
Archived from groups: linux>debian>maint>java (more info?)

I am confused about the Glassfish packages on Debian. What are they
intended for? They do not seem to install a complete running version
of Glassfish (there is no /etc/init.d script for a start) so I assume that
they are intended just to deliver JARs needed for development.

So this begs two questions, firstly why does it not say this in the
description (the implication is that if you install all of the glassfish
packages you have a complete system) and secondly what is the plan to
completethis set of packages so that we can have a complete running
glassfish installation from deb files.

David


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-REQUEST.RemoveThis@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster.RemoveThis@lists.debian.org
Back to top
Login to vote
Vincent Fourmond

External


Since: Apr 10, 2008
Posts: 7



(Msg. 2) Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2008 2:50 pm
Post subject: Re: Confused about the Glassfish packages [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Hello,

On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 1:17 PM, David Goodenough
<david.goodenough DeleteThis @linkchoose.co.uk> wrote:
> I am confused about the Glassfish packages on Debian. What are they
> intended for? They do not seem to install a complete running version
> of Glassfish (there is no /etc/init.d script for a start) so I assume that
> they are intended just to deliver JARs needed for development.
>
> So this begs two questions, firstly why does it not say this in the
> description (the implication is that if you install all of the glassfish
> packages you have a complete system) and secondly what is the plan to
> completethis set of packages so that we can have a complete running
> glassfish installation from deb files.

This would probably be more appropriate as a bug report against the
glassfish packages.

Regards,

Vincent Fourmond


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-REQUEST DeleteThis @lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster DeleteThis @lists.debian.org
Back to top
Login to vote
David Goodenough

External


Since: Apr 11, 2008
Posts: 8



(Msg. 3) Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2008 2:50 pm
Post subject: Re: Confused about the Glassfish packages [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Tuesday 09 September 2008, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 1:17 PM, David Goodenough
>
> <david.goodenough DeleteThis @linkchoose.co.uk> wrote:
> > I am confused about the Glassfish packages on Debian. What are they
> > intended for? They do not seem to install a complete running version
> > of Glassfish (there is no /etc/init.d script for a start) so I assume
> > that they are intended just to deliver JARs needed for development.
> >
> > So this begs two questions, firstly why does it not say this in the
> > description (the implication is that if you install all of the glassfish
> > packages you have a complete system) and secondly what is the plan to
> > completethis set of packages so that we can have a complete running
> > glassfish installation from deb files.
>
> This would probably be more appropriate as a bug report against the
> glassfish packages.
>
> Regards,
>
> Vincent Fourmond

Well not really. If all they are intended to be is a source of JARs for
development purposes than thats fine (but it would be useful to be told).

Its only if they are intended to be all of glassfish that there is a bug.

Also if there is a plan in place to provide the rest, then raising a bug is
just noise.

For this reason I thought that a discussion on the list was the best starting
point.

David


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-REQUEST DeleteThis @lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster DeleteThis @lists.debian.org
Back to top
Login to vote
Kumar Appaiah

External


Since: Sep 09, 2008
Posts: 4



(Msg. 4) Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2008 3:10 pm
Post subject: Re: Confused about the Glassfish packages [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 01:48:10PM +0100, David Goodenough wrote:
> Well not really. If all they are intended to be is a source of JARs for
> development purposes than thats fine (but it would be useful to be told).
>
> Its only if they are intended to be all of glassfish that there is a bug.

If I recall correctly, that is still the aim. But I am not sure if
Torsten managed to fully package all the dependencies needed to set up
and run an instance.

But I am sure that it is their aim to make available various Java
based application servers in Debian, and they were working one by one
on the dependencies.

Someone please correct me if I am wrong.

Thanks.

Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-REQUEST RemoveThis @lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster RemoveThis @lists.debian.org
Back to top
Login to vote
David Goodenough

External


Since: Apr 11, 2008
Posts: 8



(Msg. 5) Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2008 4:30 pm
Post subject: Re: Confused about the Glassfish packages [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Tuesday 09 September 2008, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> On Tue Sep 09 13:48, David Goodenough wrote:
> > Well not really. If all they are intended to be is a source of JARs for
> > development purposes than thats fine (but it would be useful to be told).
>
> It's a bug that you aren't told (-:
>
> I'd say either there's a wishlist or normal bug about the description
> and documentation, or there's an important, severe or grave bug about
>
> the functionality. In either case there's a bug though (-:

Yes but which to submit. Lets sort that out then I will add a bug (unless
someone beats me to it).

David

> > For this reason I thought that a discussion on the list was the best
> > starting point.
>
> That's still reasonable. Sadly I can't answer the original question
> though (-:
>
> Matt



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-REQUEST.TakeThisOut@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster.TakeThisOut@lists.debian.org
Back to top
Login to vote
Dalibor Topic

External


Since: Sep 09, 2008
Posts: 1



(Msg. 6) Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2008 5:00 pm
Post subject: Re: Confused about the Glassfish packages [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 01:48:10PM +0100, David Goodenough wrote:
>
>> Well not really. If all they are intended to be is a source of JARs for
>> development purposes than thats fine (but it would be useful to be told).
>>
>> Its only if they are intended to be all of glassfish that there is a bug.
>>
>
> If I recall correctly, that is still the aim. But I am not sure if
> Torsten managed to fully package all the dependencies needed to set up
> and run an instance.
>
Not yet - there is a bunch of things missing.

cheers,
dalibor topic

--
*******************************************************************
Dalibor Topic Tel: (+49 40) 23 646 738
Java F/OSS Ambassador AIM: robiladonaim
Sun Microsystems GmbH Mobile: (+49 177) 2664 192
Nagelsweg 55 http://openjdk.java.net
D-20097 Hamburg mailto:Dalibor.Topic@sun.com
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Sonnenallee 1, D-85551 Kirchheim-Heimstetten
Amtsgericht München: HRB 161028
Geschäftsführer: Thomas Schröder, Wolfgang Engels, Dr. Roland Bömer
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates: Martin Häring



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-REQUEST.DeleteThis@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster.DeleteThis@lists.debian.org
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
Related Topics:
Eclipse packages status - Hello, this email summarizes Eclipse current status. A work is in progress to update existing packages. These are must-have. Besides these, that are a lot of others packages that could be packaged. Some of them are available in Fedora already[8]. Fedor...

kaffe transition: works packages - Hi, I've a package (bootchart) that is marked as works on the transition page[1]. What must I do? Do I need to upload a new version? The Java Byte Code in the old package should be compatible to the one of the new JVM. Bye, Jörg. [1]..

Wiki page for requested packages - Hi all, We've put a page[1] on the Debian Wiki in order to gather the Java apps you want to be packaged. So please, feel free to add your request to the page. And of course, also feel free to help us make Java rocking on Debian ;) [1]..

[mkoch@konqueror.de: ftp.debian.org: orig tarballs get los.. - Hello all, I filed the attached bug report because the orig tarballs of tomcat5 and libxalan2-java are missing in the main section of the archive. They are present in the contrib section bug 'apt-cache source ...' fails because it looks in main only. I...

A test, really sorry - Andrew. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
       Linux (Home) -> Java All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Page 1 of 1

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Categories:
 Windows Forums
 Game Forums
  Linux Forums
 Mac Forums
 PDA Forums
 Mobile Forums
  Top  |  Store  |  RSS Feeds RSS  |  Data Feeds  |  Advertise  |  Submit  |  Bookmark  |  Newsletter  |  Contact