[story] aya (working title) #3

emmel wrote:
> On 2008-10-26, Red Dragon <agclurker.RemoveThis@lurkerson.net> wrote:
>> emmel wrote:
>>> On 2008-10-23, Red Dragon <agclurker.RemoveThis@lurkerson.net> wrote:
>>>> You're thinking of Texas and Hollywood. I come from an area where
>>>> 'modest' means 'I can't hold a pencil up.'
>>> I don't think there are any studies on that, but, um, wouldn't you need
>>> rather big breasts for that to work?
>> Probably just droopy ones, actually.
>
> Makes sense, though it somewhat outrules pencils as size benchmark.

Yeah, I sorta just realized it myself... I had always assumed it was a
size thing ever since my mom told me I was going to wear a bra if I got
to the size of holding a pencil up. I was pretty resistant to the idea
of a bra for quite some time.

On 2008-10-26, Red Dragon <agclurker.DeleteThis@lurkerson.net> wrote:
> emmel wrote:
>> On 2008-10-23, Red Dragon <agclurker.DeleteThis@lurkerson.net> wrote:
>>> emmel wrote:
>>>> On 2008-10-22, Red Dragon <agclurker.DeleteThis@lurkerson.net> wrote:
>>>>> emmel wrote:
>>>>>> On 2008-10-20, Red Dragon <agclurker.DeleteThis@lurkerson.net> wrote:
>>>>>>> Uh, I mean... What are you talking about? I think nothing but the purest
>>>>>>> of thoughts. I'm a perfect lady, thank you.
>>>>>> Ah yes. And the one has what to do with the other exactly?
>>>>> Well, supposedly a lot in crazy-old-fashioned-land. But now I distracted
>>>>> by the urge to read too much into that comment.
>>>> Actually, being a lady is defined by *behaviour*, or what passes for it.
>>>> Thoughts don't go into that equation. And besides, there's a lot of
>>>> truth in how fortune greeted me one of these days: "Lady: Someone who
>>>> never shows her underwear unintentionally."
>>> Well, that's a problem easily solved: Don't wear underwear
>>
>> Don't expect me to complain.
>
> Of course you're not going to complain. Because going commando is
> against my personal rules for comfort reasons.

Yes, I'm completely with you on this one.

>>> But seriously... I still couldn't claim perfect ladyship, even though I
>>> strictly adhere to that rule, since I apparently talk about my own
>>> breasts with people on the internet.
>>
>> So what? It's not like you posted pictures of it or something. As weird
>> as it sounds, but we are having a rather civilized conversation between
>> addults about a topic that
>>
>
> Hm. Yes. No 'girls gone wild' here.

Say's the dragon battling the pirates.

>>> Probably not lady-like.
>>
>> I think the standards for being a lady have changed a bit since "sit at
>> home and have tea with your co-ladies while your husband goes out and
>> does as pleases him". Fortunately.
>
> Indeed. Although, I still like to drink tea, as well as do cross-stitch
> and make my own clothes. Maybe play a bit of piano...

I don't really want to know how clothes made by me would look like, and
I'm not really into cross stitching. And I've kinda given up on that
piano thing... I like tea, though. Does that make me a bad lady or just
an ordinary guy? Or both?
--
emmel <the_emmel*you-know-what-that's-for*@gmx.net>
(Don't forget to remove the ** bit)

story backlogs available at http://ranira.wordpress.com

Official AGC feedback maniac

"God is playing creatures - and we're the norns."

"A hundred dead are a tragedy - a hundred thousand are statistics."

"I guess you can call yourself lucky." -
"I could, but Linda suits me a little better...
Things called lucky tend to get hit by trucks."

Proud owner of 1 (one) DISOBEDIENCE point.
Former owner of 1 (one) eating point (eaten, sigh).

Hi, I'm a .sig virus. Just copy me to your .signature. And don't worry.

emmel wrote:
> On 2008-10-26, Red Dragon <agclurker DeleteThis @lurkerson.net> wrote:
>> emmel wrote:
>>> On 2008-10-23, Red Dragon <agclurker DeleteThis @lurkerson.net> wrote:
>>>> emmel wrote:
>>>>> On 2008-10-22, Red Dragon <agclurker DeleteThis @lurkerson.net> wrote:
>>>>>> emmel wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2008-10-20, Red Dragon <agclurker DeleteThis @lurkerson.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Uh, I mean... What are you talking about? I think nothing but the purest
>>>>>>>> of thoughts. I'm a perfect lady, thank you.
>>>>>>> Ah yes. And the one has what to do with the other exactly?
>>>>>> Well, supposedly a lot in crazy-old-fashioned-land. But now I distracted
>>>>>> by the urge to read too much into that comment.
>>>>> Actually, being a lady is defined by *behaviour*, or what passes for it.
>>>>> Thoughts don't go into that equation. And besides, there's a lot of
>>>>> truth in how fortune greeted me one of these days: "Lady: Someone who
>>>>> never shows her underwear unintentionally."
>>>> Well, that's a problem easily solved: Don't wear underwear
>>> Don't expect me to complain.
>> Of course you're not going to complain. Because going commando is
>> against my personal rules for comfort reasons.
>
> Yes, I'm completely with you on this one.
>
>>>> But seriously... I still couldn't claim perfect ladyship, even though I
>>>> strictly adhere to that rule, since I apparently talk about my own
>>>> breasts with people on the internet.
>>> So what? It's not like you posted pictures of it or something. As weird
>>> as it sounds, but we are having a rather civilized conversation between
>>> addults about a topic that
>>>
>> Hm. Yes. No 'girls gone wild' here.
>
> Say's the dragon battling the pirates.

Would you call a female dragon a girl?

>
>>>> Probably not lady-like.
>>> I think the standards for being a lady have changed a bit since "sit at
>>> home and have tea with your co-ladies while your husband goes out and
>>> does as pleases him". Fortunately.
>> Indeed. Although, I still like to drink tea, as well as do cross-stitch
>> and make my own clothes. Maybe play a bit of piano...
>
> I don't really want to know how clothes made by me would look like, and
> I'm not really into cross stitching. And I've kinda given up on that
> piano thing... I like tea, though. Does that make me a bad lady or just
> an ordinary guy? Or both?

Well, they certainly are not mutually exclusive... But I should hope the
things I just rattled off are not the one and only requirements for
being a lady.

Thus Red Dragon spoke:

On different notes: Did you have a look at the errors in ATC? Because
I'm really curious how bad it is... Not wanting to put you under any
kind of pressure, though...
--
emmel <the_emmel*you-know-what-that's-for*@gmx.net>
(Don't forget to remove the ** bit)

story archives available at http://ranira.wordpress.com

Official AGC feedback maniac

"God is playing creatures - and we're the norns."

"A hundred dead are a tragedy - a hundred thousand are statistics."

"I guess you can call yourself lucky." -
"I could, but Linda suits me a little better...
Things called lucky tend to get hit by trucks."

Proud owner of 1 (one) DISOBEDIENCE point.
Former owner of 1 (one) eating point (eaten, sigh).

Hi, I'm a .sig virus. Just copy me to your .signature. And don't worry.

emmel wrote:
> Thus Red Dragon spoke:
>
> On different notes: Did you have a look at the errors in ATC? Because
> I'm really curious how bad it is... Not wanting to put you under any
> kind of pressure, though...

Well, I'm afraid school is getting in way of too much progress on ATC...
So far I'm not seeing anything that would warrant a comment about it
being barely decipherable.

Red Dragon wrote:
> emmel wrote:
>> On 2008-10-26, Neo <what.TakeThisOut@thematrix.is> wrote:
>>> Red Dragon wrote:
>>>> Neo wrote:
>>> I agree! Though I can't say I have any experience with fake breasts.
>>> Though I love silicon (in computer chips en GPUs).
>>>
>>> I had this joke for myself: since I am going to work in IT, I might as
>>> well have a wife with silicon implants. That never happened of course
>>> (neither).
>>>
>>> I now fix computers of friends and family (with silicon) for a very
>>> small fee (will fix your computer for a warm meal). And my gf has the
>>> 100% human tissues and I am very pleased with that! I don't know how I
>>> could have done without them since I was a toddler! Real comforting to
>>> have them around (though there is the sexual aspect too of course).
>>>
>>> As Björk put it: "You can't be safer, can't be more secure. Than with a
>>> breast in each palm. That is they way I was born, that is the way I
>>> want to die".
>>
>> Um, actually it's 'silicon' and 'silicone'... Not written the same
>> way and if I'm not mistaken not spoken the same way either.
>> <d&rlh>
>
> Indeed on both accounts. However, they're so similar that people around
> here commonly get them horribly mixed-up.
>
> But he could still have a wife with silicon implants... In that 'Borg'
> sort of way.

Did I mention I have a poster of Seven of Nine here? Though I am not
sure she has silicone in addition of silicon.
She tends to be the exact opposite of 'insecure' in the role she plays.
"Define being insecure" she would reply She is a machine and I love
it. Best out of two worlds.

Neo
--
Everything that has a beginning has an end.

On 2008-10-28, Red Dragon <agclurker.RemoveThis@lurkerson.net> wrote:
> emmel wrote:
>> Thus Red Dragon spoke:
>>
>> On different notes: Did you have a look at the errors in ATC? Because
>> I'm really curious how bad it is... Not wanting to put you under any
>> kind of pressure, though...
>
> Well, I'm afraid school is getting in way of too much progress on ATC...
> So far I'm not seeing anything that would warrant a comment about it
> being barely decipherable.

Hm... maybe I should ask for clarification on that review.
--
emmel <the_emmel*you-know-what-that's-for*@gmx.net>
(Don't forget to remove the ** bit)

story backlogs available at http://ranira.wordpress.com

Official AGC feedback maniac

"God is playing creatures - and we're the norns."

"A hundred dead are a tragedy - a hundred thousand are statistics."

"I guess you can call yourself lucky." -
"I could, but Linda suits me a little better...
Things called lucky tend to get hit by trucks."

Proud owner of 1 (one) DISOBEDIENCE point.
Former owner of 1 (one) eating point (eaten, sigh).

Hi, I'm a .sig virus. Just copy me to your .signature. And don't worry.

On 2008-10-28, Red Dragon <agclurker.DeleteThis@lurkerson.net> wrote:
> emmel wrote:
>> On 2008-10-26, Red Dragon <agclurker.DeleteThis@lurkerson.net> wrote:
>>> Hm. Yes. No 'girls gone wild' here.
>>
>> Say's the dragon battling the pirates.
>
> Would you call a female dragon a girl?

Yes. Why?

>>>>> Probably not lady-like.
>>>> I think the standards for being a lady have changed a bit since "sit at
>>>> home and have tea with your co-ladies while your husband goes out and
>>>> does as pleases him". Fortunately.
>>> Indeed. Although, I still like to drink tea, as well as do cross-stitch
>>> and make my own clothes. Maybe play a bit of piano...
>>
>> I don't really want to know how clothes made by me would look like, and
>> I'm not really into cross stitching. And I've kinda given up on that
>> piano thing... I like tea, though. Does that make me a bad lady or just
>> an ordinary guy? Or both?
>
> Well, they certainly are not mutually exclusive... But I should hope the
> things I just rattled off are not the one and only requirements for
> being a lady.

Well, then there's still hope for me, eh?
--
emmel <the_emmel*you-know-what-that's-for*@gmx.net>
(Don't forget to remove the ** bit)

story backlogs available at http://ranira.wordpress.com

Official AGC feedback maniac

"God is playing creatures - and we're the norns."

"A hundred dead are a tragedy - a hundred thousand are statistics."

"I guess you can call yourself lucky." -
"I could, but Linda suits me a little better...
Things called lucky tend to get hit by trucks."

Proud owner of 1 (one) DISOBEDIENCE point.
Former owner of 1 (one) eating point (eaten, sigh).

Hi, I'm a .sig virus. Just copy me to your .signature. And don't worry.

On 2008-10-28, Red Dragon <agclurker.DeleteThis@lurkerson.net> wrote:
> emmel wrote:
>> On 2008-10-26, Red Dragon <agclurker.DeleteThis@lurkerson.net> wrote:
>>> emmel wrote:
>>>> On 2008-10-23, Red Dragon <agclurker.DeleteThis@lurkerson.net> wrote:
>>>>> You're thinking of Texas and Hollywood. I come from an area where
>>>>> 'modest' means 'I can't hold a pencil up.'
>>>> I don't think there are any studies on that, but, um, wouldn't you need
>>>> rather big breasts for that to work?
>>> Probably just droopy ones, actually.
>>
>> Makes sense, though it somewhat outrules pencils as size benchmark.
>
> Yeah, I sorta just realized it myself... I had always assumed it was a
> size thing ever since my mom told me I was going to wear a bra if I got
> to the size of holding a pencil up. I was pretty resistant to the idea
> of a bra for quite some time.

Well, that not necessarily a bad thing. I mean, if you don't feel that
you need it, you probably don't.
--
emmel <the_emmel*you-know-what-that's-for*@gmx.net>
(Don't forget to remove the ** bit)

story backlogs available at http://ranira.wordpress.com

Official AGC feedback maniac

"God is playing creatures - and we're the norns."

"A hundred dead are a tragedy - a hundred thousand are statistics."

"I guess you can call yourself lucky." -
"I could, but Linda suits me a little better...
Things called lucky tend to get hit by trucks."

Proud owner of 1 (one) DISOBEDIENCE point.
Former owner of 1 (one) eating point (eaten, sigh).

Hi, I'm a .sig virus. Just copy me to your .signature. And don't worry.

On 2008-10-29, Neo <what.TakeThisOut@thematrix.is> wrote:
> Red Dragon wrote:
>> emmel wrote:
>>> On 2008-10-26, Neo <what.TakeThisOut@thematrix.is> wrote:
>>>> Red Dragon wrote:
>>>>> Neo wrote:
>>>> I agree! Though I can't say I have any experience with fake breasts.
>>>> Though I love silicon (in computer chips en GPUs).
>>>>
>>>> I had this joke for myself: since I am going to work in IT, I might as
>>>> well have a wife with silicon implants. That never happened of course
>>>> (neither).
>>>>
>>>> I now fix computers of friends and family (with silicon) for a very
>>>> small fee (will fix your computer for a warm meal). And my gf has the
>>>> 100% human tissues and I am very pleased with that! I don't know how I
>>>> could have done without them since I was a toddler! Real comforting to
>>>> have them around (though there is the sexual aspect too of course).
>>>>
>>>> As Björk put it: "You can't be safer, can't be more secure. Than with a
>>>> breast in each palm. That is they way I was born, that is the way I
>>>> want to die".
>>>
>>> Um, actually it's 'silicon' and 'silicone'... Not written the same
>>> way and if I'm not mistaken not spoken the same way either.
>>> <d&rlh>
>>
>> Indeed on both accounts. However, they're so similar that people around
>> here commonly get them horribly mixed-up.
>>
>> But he could still have a wife with silicon implants... In that 'Borg'
>> sort of way.
>
> Did I mention I have a poster of Seven of Nine here? Though I am not
> sure she has silicone in addition of silicon.
> She tends to be the exact opposite of 'insecure' in the role she plays.
> "Define being insecure" she would reply She is a machine and I love
> it. Best out of two worlds.

That's a question of personal preference I think...
--
emmel <the_emmel*you-know-what-that's-for*@gmx.net>
(Don't forget to remove the ** bit)

story backlogs available at http://ranira.wordpress.com

Official AGC feedback maniac

"God is playing creatures - and we're the norns."

"A hundred dead are a tragedy - a hundred thousand are statistics."

"I guess you can call yourself lucky." -
"I could, but Linda suits me a little better...
Things called lucky tend to get hit by trucks."

Proud owner of 1 (one) DISOBEDIENCE point.
Former owner of 1 (one) eating point (eaten, sigh).

Hi, I'm a .sig virus. Just copy me to your .signature. And don't worry.

emmel wrote:
> On 2008-10-28, Red Dragon <agclurker RemoveThis @lurkerson.net> wrote:
>> emmel wrote:
>>> On 2008-10-26, Red Dragon <agclurker RemoveThis @lurkerson.net> wrote:
>>>> Hm. Yes. No 'girls gone wild' here.
>>> Say's the dragon battling the pirates.
>> Would you call a female dragon a girl?
>
> Yes. Why?

Nevermind then. Dragons on rampage just doesn't seem to be sufficiently
described by 'girls gone wild.'

>
>>>>>> Probably not lady-like.
>>>>> I think the standards for being a lady have changed a bit since "sit at
>>>>> home and have tea with your co-ladies while your husband goes out and
>>>>> does as pleases him". Fortunately.
>>>> Indeed. Although, I still like to drink tea, as well as do cross-stitch
>>>> and make my own clothes. Maybe play a bit of piano...
>>> I don't really want to know how clothes made by me would look like, and
>>> I'm not really into cross stitching. And I've kinda given up on that
>>> piano thing... I like tea, though. Does that make me a bad lady or just
>>> an ordinary guy? Or both?
>> Well, they certainly are not mutually exclusive... But I should hope the
>> things I just rattled off are not the one and only requirements for
>> being a lady.
>
> Well, then there's still hope for me, eh?

Why? Are you giving up on being a guy? Or do you just want to horn in on
all the perks of being a lady, like cramps, child birth, and not being
taken seriously?

emmel wrote:
> On 2008-10-28, Red Dragon <agclurker.TakeThisOut@lurkerson.net> wrote:
>> emmel wrote:
>>> Thus Red Dragon spoke:
>>>
>>> On different notes: Did you have a look at the errors in ATC? Because
>>> I'm really curious how bad it is... Not wanting to put you under any
>>> kind of pressure, though...
>> Well, I'm afraid school is getting in way of too much progress on ATC...
>> So far I'm not seeing anything that would warrant a comment about it
>> being barely decipherable.
>
> Hm... maybe I should ask for clarification on that review.

As I said, I haven't been able to make very good progress on it. I
understand how you'd want to know what's up as quickly as possible.

I wish I still had time for personal reading...

Thus Red Dragon spoke:

> emmel wrote:
>> On 2008-10-28, Red Dragon <agclurker.DeleteThis@lurkerson.net> wrote:
>>> emmel wrote:
>>>> On 2008-10-26, Red Dragon <agclurker.DeleteThis@lurkerson.net> wrote:
>>>>> Hm. Yes. No 'girls gone wild' here.
>>>> Say's the dragon battling the pirates.
>>> Would you call a female dragon a girl?
>>
>> Yes. Why?
>
> Nevermind then. Dragons on rampage just doesn't seem to be sufficiently
> described by 'girls gone wild.'

::shrugs::
Mu-lam'bda have a different scale for judging these things.

>>>>>>> Probably not lady-like.
>>>>>> I think the standards for being a lady have changed a bit since "sit at
>>>>>> home and have tea with your co-ladies while your husband goes out and
>>>>>> does as pleases him". Fortunately.
>>>>> Indeed. Although, I still like to drink tea, as well as do cross-stitch
>>>>> and make my own clothes. Maybe play a bit of piano...
>>>> I don't really want to know how clothes made by me would look like, and
>>>> I'm not really into cross stitching. And I've kinda given up on that
>>>> piano thing... I like tea, though. Does that make me a bad lady or just
>>>> an ordinary guy? Or both?
>>> Well, they certainly are not mutually exclusive... But I should hope the
>>> things I just rattled off are not the one and only requirements for
>>> being a lady.
>>
>> Well, then there's still hope for me, eh?
>
> Why? Are you giving up on being a guy? Or do you just want to horn in on
> all the perks of being a lady, like cramps, child birth, and not being
> taken seriously?

Because. Nah. Don't make it sound that bad. In this order.
--
emmel <the_emmel*you-know-what-that's-for*@gmx.net>
(Don't forget to remove the ** bit)

story archives available at http://ranira.wordpress.com

Official AGC feedback maniac

"God is playing creatures - and we're the norns."

"A hundred dead are a tragedy - a hundred thousand are statistics."

"I guess you can call yourself lucky." -
"I could, but Linda suits me a little better...
Things called lucky tend to get hit by trucks."

Proud owner of 1 (one) DISOBEDIENCE point.
Former owner of 1 (one) eating point (eaten, sigh).

Hi, I'm a .sig virus. Just copy me to your .signature. And don't worry.