WOLF FH Admins

No, I did not get banned while I was there, no I did not do anything
wrong... with the exception perhaps of calling you on your double-
standards and perhaps cursing in my "last sentence I will ever speak on
your server again."

See, WOLF-FH-ADMINS have this uncanny ability to apply rules as they see
fit, at different times with different inflections. A guy I know bailed
out of his destoyed ship on Midway. He swam to the closest ship (an
enemy carrier), to obtain transport, a landing craft. He did so.

As with any uncapturable spawn, per YOUR rules, you're allowed to get
in, get out, just don't kill anyone. I've heard this many, many times
from WOLF admins, folks like Luger, Mike, Mosquito, etc. on maps such as
Battle of Britain, etc. Bail, steal a plane, steal a jeep, whatever,
just don't kill anyone, don't camp.

Well, guess what? This guy stole the landing craft, without killing any
of you. Your Carrier was then destroyed by one of our ships. After it
went down, my friend was in the landing craft, he turned around and
killed all of you that were IN THE WATER with the machine gun on the
landing craft. You got pissed off and kicked him with a one minute ban.

I tried to reason with you in the game. At no time did you say "take it
to the forums", you just said "...it's a one minute kick/ban, deal with
it" and started stating how "this is different". Yea, it's different
alright, you two faced pricks. It's different because you say so. It's
different "this time".

You said he "lingered" for too long. If he did not kill anyone, what
does it matter if he stayed there for 2 days? He could see your planes
taking off and he'd be visible on our minimaps as an indication of where
your ship was? lol. I can understand not killing someone in the uncap,
that's fine and dandy, but folks, spying is a part of war.

You've been accused of teamspeak hacking/spying and I took up for you,
just last night as a matter of fact. One of the SoV guys was running his
mouth constantly last night because one of the WOLF guys was on the
opposite team of the rest of you guys. Not 1 hour after that, [WOLF]
Assassin was seen by me using the engineer-gun-glitch. He reloaded and
fired three times within a second or two, he was standing next to the
upper Goliath on Seelow Heights. I felt like I was slapped in the face.
I always held the WOLF folks up to a higher standard because of your
rules and I *thought* your members had better ethics than this. I even
put Assassin on my buddy list so that I could keep an eye on him and
make sure he wasn't cheating further.

Like I said in game speak, it's your server, your rules. Fine. I won't
play there. Neither will most of the rest of the IWZ folks. But hey,
that's ok. Why? Because we've put a 64 player server, dual Xeon 2.8 Ghz
processors with 2 gigs of ram. Maybe no one will come there.... but if
everyone gets treated the way I've been hearing you've treated others,
I'd say they'll come around. We haven't tried to take your visitors. We
haven't tried to spam your forums or other forums. We've been treated ok
thus far. We've seen some of your true colors coming through, how you've
treated some of the folks coming to your server and how you hold a
different standard for WOLF players and their use of armor near/around
an uncapturable base and we've been weary.

Guess what? Play time is over now. You can spout all the lies about us
that you want, it doesn't matter, your true colors will show. People
will learn the type of hypocrites that you are. We have roots into the
FH community that are completely unknown to most. We have a member that
has ties to the FH mod team. I've held my tongue long enough. Perhaps
you may view this as a "vent" and perhaps it is, but let me get one
thing straight, this will turn into a war and we will win, I can
guarantee you that.

So, go ahead and stay in bed with EA for your ranked BF2 servers. Go
ahead and create rules as you go along. Other people, like myself, will
see what a bunch of losers you folks are. I'd rather not play
Battlefield than play on a server like yours.




/CF


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

I never had a problem with the WOLF guys... only the [hslan.de] guys. I got
banned for 10 minutes for stealing a tank from the Allied main base... That
was BS. I see the [hslan] dudes steal equipment with no problems... That
really pisses me off.

Have an 'anything goes' server. If someone wants to spawn-kill, let them.
Spawn somewhere else, then go find them and kill them. If its your last
spawn point... well then, you lose... next map please.

Don't micro-manage the servers. The only things I could see someone getting
kicked for is abusive language and TKing (on purpose). I started a game the
other day with negative points when I killed a tank that my teammate was
playing around near (jumping on it and such). How the heck am I supposed to
miss him from across the board. I ftk people all the time... and only get it
in return once in a while because people don't even know about it. So even
TKing needs to be a visual thing with the admin. Negative scores don't
always tell the whole story.

Basically, macro-manage a game. Look for only blatant things. When I was
playing on the IWZ server last night I felt like they did it that way. One
guy was warned numerious times before he got kicked for doing something.
That is the right way to do it.

Just my 2 pence.
-Kevin




"Colonel_Flagg" <colonel_flagg RemoveThis @NOSOUPFORJ00-internetwarzone.org> wrote in
message news:MPG.1d4e38bcb7a7e36a9896da@News-East.newsfeeds.com...
> No, I did not get banned while I was there, no I did not do anything
> wrong... with the exception perhaps of calling you on your double-
> standards and perhaps cursing in my "last sentence I will ever speak on
> your server again."
>
> See, WOLF-FH-ADMINS have this uncanny ability to apply rules as they see
> fit, at different times with different inflections. A guy I know bailed
> out of his destoyed ship on Midway. He swam to the closest ship (an
> enemy carrier), to obtain transport, a landing craft. He did so.
>
> As with any uncapturable spawn, per YOUR rules, you're allowed to get
> in, get out, just don't kill anyone. I've heard this many, many times
> from WOLF admins, folks like Luger, Mike, Mosquito, etc. on maps such as
> Battle of Britain, etc. Bail, steal a plane, steal a jeep, whatever,
> just don't kill anyone, don't camp.
>
> Well, guess what? This guy stole the landing craft, without killing any
> of you. Your Carrier was then destroyed by one of our ships. After it
> went down, my friend was in the landing craft, he turned around and
> killed all of you that were IN THE WATER with the machine gun on the
> landing craft. You got pissed off and kicked him with a one minute ban.
>
> I tried to reason with you in the game. At no time did you say "take it
> to the forums", you just said "...it's a one minute kick/ban, deal with
> it" and started stating how "this is different". Yea, it's different
> alright, you two faced pricks. It's different because you say so. It's
> different "this time".
>
> You said he "lingered" for too long. If he did not kill anyone, what
> does it matter if he stayed there for 2 days? He could see your planes
> taking off and he'd be visible on our minimaps as an indication of where
> your ship was? lol. I can understand not killing someone in the uncap,
> that's fine and dandy, but folks, spying is a part of war.
>
> You've been accused of teamspeak hacking/spying and I took up for you,
> just last night as a matter of fact. One of the SoV guys was running his
> mouth constantly last night because one of the WOLF guys was on the
> opposite team of the rest of you guys. Not 1 hour after that, [WOLF]
> Assassin was seen by me using the engineer-gun-glitch. He reloaded and
> fired three times within a second or two, he was standing next to the
> upper Goliath on Seelow Heights. I felt like I was slapped in the face.
> I always held the WOLF folks up to a higher standard because of your
> rules and I *thought* your members had better ethics than this. I even
> put Assassin on my buddy list so that I could keep an eye on him and
> make sure he wasn't cheating further.
>
> Like I said in game speak, it's your server, your rules. Fine. I won't
> play there. Neither will most of the rest of the IWZ folks. But hey,
> that's ok. Why? Because we've put a 64 player server, dual Xeon 2.8 Ghz
> processors with 2 gigs of ram. Maybe no one will come there.... but if
> everyone gets treated the way I've been hearing you've treated others,
> I'd say they'll come around. We haven't tried to take your visitors. We
> haven't tried to spam your forums or other forums. We've been treated ok
> thus far. We've seen some of your true colors coming through, how you've
> treated some of the folks coming to your server and how you hold a
> different standard for WOLF players and their use of armor near/around
> an uncapturable base and we've been weary.
>
> Guess what? Play time is over now. You can spout all the lies about us
> that you want, it doesn't matter, your true colors will show. People
> will learn the type of hypocrites that you are. We have roots into the
> FH community that are completely unknown to most. We have a member that
> has ties to the FH mod team. I've held my tongue long enough. Perhaps
> you may view this as a "vent" and perhaps it is, but let me get one
> thing straight, this will turn into a war and we will win, I can
> guarantee you that.
>
> So, go ahead and stay in bed with EA for your ranked BF2 servers. Go
> ahead and create rules as you go along. Other people, like myself, will
> see what a bunch of losers you folks are. I'd rather not play
> Battlefield than play on a server like yours.
>
>
>
>
> /CF
>
>
> ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet
> News==----
> http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+
> Newsgroups
> ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption
> =----