Violent PC and video-games should be OUTLAWED!!!

Professor Digby wrote:
> "Carl Dau" <lord_melton.RemoveThis@yahoo.com.ar> wrote in message
> news:58664891-e3e9-41be-a280-99348431d234@l33g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
>> New studies have shown that violent fps games make kids more
>> aggressive.That means, these games are dangerous and responsible for
>> killing sprees and school shootings.
>>
>> That's why these games should be BANNED and OUTLAWED worldwide.
>>
>> You should only play cute, non-violent games, but games such as
>> Crysis, Fallout 3 or the Call of Duty series should be BANNED.
>>
>> These games are murder-simulations, Killer Games, that turn our kids
>> into monsters.
>>
>> OUTLAW ALL VIOLENT PC AND VIDEO GAMES!!!
>
>
> FAIL!
>
> You are a pathetic troll.


FAIL. You replied to the troll site where they count the replies...
eunet.esprit

On Fri, 26 Dec 2008 11:56:31 -0800, "Professor Digby"
<prof.TakeThisOut@here.invalid> wrote:

>"Carl Dau" <lord_melton.TakeThisOut@yahoo.com.ar> wrote in message
>news:58664891-e3e9-41be-a280-99348431d234@l33g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
>> New studies have shown that violent fps games make kids more
>> aggressive.That means, these games are dangerous and responsible for
>> killing sprees and school shootings.
>>
[...]
>> OUTLAW ALL VIOLENT PC AND VIDEO GAMES!!!
>
>
>FAIL!

Not really. He tricked you into crossposting into an unrelated
newsgroup - for purposes of keeping score.

Carl Dau wrote:
> ...
> OUTLAW ALL VIOLENT PC AND VIDEO GAMES!!!
>

Troll-o-meter: [E.\................F]


(special thanks to Old Salt)



** score keeping newsgroup deleted **

--
"Any attempt to replace a personal conscience by a collective conscience
does violence to the individual and is the first step toward
totalitarianism." - Herman Hesse

"Shawk" <shawk DeleteThis @clara.co.uk.3guesses> wrote in message
news:yfedncPUjePJpsjUnZ2dnUVZ8owAAAAA@bt.com...
> FAIL. You replied to the troll site where they count the replies...
> eunet.esprit
>

I knew that so didn't fail.

"Raymond Martineau" <bk039 RemoveThis @ncf.ca> wrote in message
news:i69bl4pracprrnnb9jor6rn8ikigkv44lj@4ax.com...
> Not really. He tricked you into crossposting into an unrelated
> newsgroup - for purposes of keeping score.


He didn't "trick" me into anything. I replied because I felt like it.

"Professor Digby" <prof.RemoveThis@here.invalid> looked up from reading the
entrails of the porn spammer to utter "The Augury is good, the signs
say:

>"Raymond Martineau" <bk039.RemoveThis@ncf.ca> wrote in message
>news:i69bl4pracprrnnb9jor6rn8ikigkv44lj@4ax.com...
>> Not really. He tricked you into crossposting into an unrelated
>> newsgroup - for purposes of keeping score.
>
>
>He didn't "trick" me into anything. I replied because I felt like it.

So you deliberately replied both to this group and the troll's score
keeping group?

That makes you a moron.

Xocyll
--
I don't particularly want you to FOAD, myself. You'll be more of
a cautionary example if you'll FO And Get Chronically, Incurably,
Painfully, Progressively, Expensively, Debilitatingly Ill. So
FOAGCIPPEDI. -- Mike Andrews responding to an idiot in asr

"Gombi Lot" <gombilot.RemoveThis@mailsnipped.com> wrote in message
news:tqjfl41oh9m7ahfq53s5q9j37rh8jts7om@4ax.com...
> Do you even know what schizophrenia (note correct spelling) is?
> If you look it up, I think you'd see that the paranoia you display in
> your post is a more likely symptom than anything I've said.


The majority of the populace is still very ignorant as to just what
schizophrenia is. Can you blame them when people like Ian Hunter put out an
album titled 'You're Never Alone With A Schizophrenic'? <rolls eyes at Ian
Hunter>

On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 18:45:52 -0800, "Professor Digby"
<prof.TakeThisOut@here.invalid> wrote:

>"Gombi Lot" <gombilot.TakeThisOut@mailsnipped.com> wrote in message
>news:tqjfl41oh9m7ahfq53s5q9j37rh8jts7om@4ax.com...
>> Do you even know what schizophrenia (note correct spelling) is?
>> If you look it up, I think you'd see that the paranoia you display in
>> your post is a more likely symptom than anything I've said.
>
>
>The majority of the populace is still very ignorant as to just what
>schizophrenia is. Can you blame them when people like Ian Hunter put out an
>album titled 'You're Never Alone With A Schizophrenic'? <rolls eyes at Ian
>Hunter>

Yes and it's the majority of the populace that are the first to open
mouth and insert foot on usenet or whatever forum they choose to troll
on that day.

On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 23:53:14 -0500, Gombi Lot
<gombilot RemoveThis @mailsnipped.com> wrote:

>Yes and it's the majority of the populace that are the first to open
>mouth and insert foot on usenet or whatever forum they choose to troll
>on that day.

So you don't change your user name at least every two weeks?

On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 18:45:52 -0800, "Professor Digby" <prof.RemoveThis@here.invalid>
wrote:

>"Gombi Lot" <gombilot.RemoveThis@mailsnipped.com> wrote in message
>news:tqjfl41oh9m7ahfq53s5q9j37rh8jts7om@4ax.com...
>> Do you even know what schizophrenia (note correct spelling) is?
>> If you look it up, I think you'd see that the paranoia you display in
>> your post is a more likely symptom than anything I've said.
>
>
>The majority of the populace is still very ignorant as to just what
>schizophrenia is. Can you blame them when people like Ian Hunter put out an
>album titled 'You're Never Alone With A Schizophrenic'? <rolls eyes at Ian
>Hunter>

Roses are Red.
Violets are Blue.
I'm a Schizophrenic.
And so am I.

On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 18:42:38 -0800, "Professor Digby"
<prof.RemoveThis@here.invalid> wrote:

> I just click reply

Here's a better suggestion: don't click reply - especially if you
can't make said reply funny.

As you should know, that troll follows a known pattern of posting a
semi-related message to as many newsgroups as possible in order to
perform reply flooding - and has done so within a span of a few years.
Since reply spamming is still spamming, don't be suprised if people
change their killfiles.

>and don't go searching through headers and

Any decent newsreader gives the ability to change the target newsgroup
without having to open up headers. In other words, don't use Outlook.

"Carl Dau" <lord_melton RemoveThis @yahoo.com.ar> wrote in message
news:58664891-e3e9-41be-a280-99348431d234@l33g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
> New studies have shown that violent fps games make kids more
> aggressive.That means, these games are dangerous and responsible for
> killing sprees and school shootings.
>
> That's why these games should be BANNED and OUTLAWED worldwide.
>
> You should only play cute, non-violent games, but games such as
> Crysis, Fallout 3 or the Call of Duty series should be BANNED.
>
> These games are murder-simulations, Killer Games, that turn our kids
> into monsters.
>
> OUTLAW ALL VIOLENT PC AND VIDEO GAMES!!!

Studies by who exactly? This kind of unsubstantiated claim really gets my
goat and it happens a lot these days. And who are all these people that keep
doing all these stupid studies anyway, I certainly hope Im not paying for
them out of my taxes. Similarly to many others here I have played loads of
violent games including playing soldiers and cowboys when I was young and
Ive never felt like hitting anyone or killing anyone. The fact is a kids
upbringing is all that matters.

And all these do gooders in the world who think they know better than
everyone else should be put up against a wall and shot.

Nats wrote:
> "Carl Dau" <lord_melton.RemoveThis@yahoo.com.ar> wrote in message
> news:58664891-e3e9-41be-a280-99348431d234@l33g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
>> New studies have shown that violent fps games make kids more
>> aggressive.That means, these games are dangerous and responsible for
>> killing sprees and school shootings.
>>
>> That's why these games should be BANNED and OUTLAWED worldwide.
>>
>> You should only play cute, non-violent games, but games such as
>> Crysis, Fallout 3 or the Call of Duty series should be BANNED.
>>
>> These games are murder-simulations, Killer Games, that turn our kids
>> into monsters.
>>
>> OUTLAW ALL VIOLENT PC AND VIDEO GAMES!!!
>
> Studies by who exactly? This kind of unsubstantiated claim really gets my
> goat and it happens a lot these days. And who are all these people that keep
> doing all these stupid studies anyway, I certainly hope Im not paying for
> them out of my taxes. Similarly to many others here I have played loads of
> violent games including playing soldiers and cowboys when I was young and
> Ive never felt like hitting anyone or killing anyone. The fact is a kids
> upbringing is all that matters.
>
> And all these do gooders in the world who think they know better than
> everyone else should be put up against a wall and shot.


FFS! What a plonker!