Real-time IF list

In article <8cednUEwOJgl67LanZ2dnUVZ_sOrnZ2d.RemoveThis@giganews.com>,
Poster <poster@!nospam!.aurora.cotse.net> wrote:
>> http://ifwiki.org/index.php/Real-Time
>I think a caveat or two should apply here, just because that particular
>wiki is very policed. Not everyone's edits are allowed to remain and
>often highly-biased opinions rule in place of the complete truth.

Ooh ooh! A juicy story full of scandal and intrigue! Tell all!

Adam

On Nov 5, 12:19 pm, a....RemoveThis@fsf.net (Adam Thornton) wrote:
> In article <8cednUEwOJgl67LanZ2dnUVZ_sOrn....RemoveThis@giganews.com>,
>
> Poster <poster@!nospam!.aurora.cotse.net> wrote:
> >>http://ifwiki.org/index.php/Real-Time
> >I think a caveat or two should apply here, just because that particular
> >wiki is very policed. Not everyone's edits are allowed to remain and
> >often highly-biased opinions rule in place of the complete truth.
>
> Ooh ooh! A juicy story full of scandal and intrigue! Tell all!
>
> Adam

Don't know enough about ifwiki to say - I only have about 10 edits.

If anyone wants to have an ifwiki revert war over the entry "real-
time", of course, I'm game. But I suspect that people are saving
their fire for other categories. Honestly, though, I don't know which
ones. Still, if someone wants to point out edits they disagree with,
the nice thing about wikis is that the histories stay there forever -
just link to them. If that doesn't work, there are always other wikis
- I've heard of one called wikipedia that has a few IF-related entries
on it.