Move to have this group removed from the records

On Jun 9, 10:35 pm, Garrot <n....TakeThisOut@email.invalid> wrote:
> c.s.ibmn.pc.games.flight-sim is completely irrelevant to PC gaming now
> and should be pemanently deleted. Sad to see what was at one time such
> a vibrant group reduced to a group almost as pathetic as the naval
> games group.

If it bothers you don't read it. Whats so hard about that?

<bradclark1.DeleteThis@msn.com> wrote in message
news:1181781879.300733.9780@d30g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
> On Jun 9, 10:35 pm, Garrot <n....DeleteThis@email.invalid> wrote:
>> c.s.ibmn.pc.games.flight-sim is completely irrelevant to PC gaming now
>> and should be pemanently deleted. Sad to see what was at one time such
>> a vibrant group reduced to a group almost as pathetic as the naval
>> games group.
>
> If it bothers you don't read it. Whats so hard about that?
>

I think his point was that there -isn't- anything to read.

Garrot <no.DeleteThis@email.invalid> wrote in news:5pom63116jbrqn2ecpgqgl27k9o4m7tshj@
4ax.com:

> c.s.ibmn.pc.games.flight-sim is completely irrelevant to PC gaming now
> and should be pemanently deleted. Sad to see what was at one time such
> a vibrant group reduced to a group almost as pathetic as the naval
> games group.


If thine eye offends thee.......

"Roger Christie" <rochrist@<REMOVETOEMAIL>charter.net> wrote in news:r%bci.20
$9i4.1@newsfe06.lga:

> <bradclark1 DeleteThis @msn.com> wrote in message
> news:1181781879.300733.9780@d30g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
>> On Jun 9, 10:35 pm, Garrot <n... DeleteThis @email.invalid> wrote:
>>> c.s.ibmn.pc.games.flight-sim is completely irrelevant to PC gaming now
>>> and should be pemanently deleted. Sad to see what was at one time such
>>> a vibrant group reduced to a group almost as pathetic as the naval
>>> games group.
>>
>> If it bothers you don't read it. Whats so hard about that?
>>
>
> I think his point was that there -isn't- anything to read.


And the solution to make SURE there isn't
anything to read?

PC game forums may be in a doldrum for the
time being because of the Xbox craze but that
is no reason to get rid of them.

Roger Christie <rochrist@ wrote:

> I think his point was that there -isn't- anything to read.

Fine, but why is he hanging around then?

Who's holding a gun to his head and forcing him to be here?

On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 11:37:23 -0500, the learned CriticalMass
<no.TakeThisOut@spam.com> cast a Level 65 wizard spell and wrote:

>Roger Christie <rochrist@ wrote:
>
>> I think his point was that there -isn't- anything to read.
>
>Fine, but why is he hanging around then?
>
>Who's holding a gun to his head and forcing him to be here?

Other option is his/her news provider isn't supplying all the posts.
In many cases the stock ISP news service would be showing very few
posts making the poster think nothing was happening.

Mind you, forums have certainly reduced the traffic on Usenet for text
groups - and some binary ones as well.

On Jun 21, 6:59 am, Mitchell Holman <Noem....RemoveThis@comcast.com> wrote:
> "Roger Christie" <rochrist@<REMOVETOEMAIL>charter.net> wrote in news:r%bci.20
> $9i...@newsfe06.lga:
>
> > <bradcla....RemoveThis@msn.com> wrote in message
> >news:1181781879.300733.9780@d30g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
> >> On Jun 9, 10:35 pm, Garrot <n....RemoveThis@email.invalid> wrote:
> >>> c.s.ibmn.pc.games.flight-sim is completely irrelevant to PC gaming now
> >>> and should be pemanently deleted. Sad to see what was at one time such
> >>> a vibrant group reduced to a group almost as pathetic as the naval
> >>> games group.
>
> >> If it bothers you don't read it. Whats so hard about that?
>
> > I think his point was that there -isn't- anything to read.
>
> And the solution to make SURE there isn't
> anything to read?
>
> PC game forums may be in a doldrum for the
> time being because of the Xbox craze but that
> is no reason to get rid of them.

The LOL. Oh for the halcyon days of the 1990s

--scharmers

Oh my, scharmers

My brainstem tells me I have heard that name before ... have you been
away all that time or just lurking ?

LS

scharmers RemoveThis @gmail.com wrote:
> On Jun 21, 6:59 am, Mitchell Holman <Noem... RemoveThis @comcast.com> wrote:
>> "Roger Christie" <rochrist@<REMOVETOEMAIL>charter.net> wrote in news:r%bci.20
>> $9i...@newsfe06.lga:
>>
>>> <bradcla... RemoveThis @msn.com> wrote in message
>>> news:1181781879.300733.9780@d30g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
>>>> On Jun 9, 10:35 pm, Garrot <n... RemoveThis @email.invalid> wrote:
>>>>> c.s.ibmn.pc.games.flight-sim is completely irrelevant to PC gaming now
>>>>> and should be pemanently deleted. Sad to see what was at one time such
>>>>> a vibrant group reduced to a group almost as pathetic as the naval
>>>>> games group.
>>>> If it bothers you don't read it. Whats so hard about that?
>>> I think his point was that there -isn't- anything to read.
>> And the solution to make SURE there isn't
>> anything to read?
>>
>> PC game forums may be in a doldrum for the
>> time being because of the Xbox craze but that
>> is no reason to get rid of them.
>
> The LOL. Oh for the halcyon days of the 1990s
>
> --scharmers
>

This message is not archived

On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 09:52:25 -0700, scharmers DeleteThis @gmail.com wrote:

>On Jun 21, 6:59 am, Mitchell Holman <Noem... DeleteThis @comcast.com> wrote:
>> "Roger Christie" <rochrist@<REMOVETOEMAIL>charter.net> wrote in news:r%bci.20
>> $9i...@newsfe06.lga:
>>
>> > <bradcla... DeleteThis @msn.com> wrote in message
>> >news:1181781879.300733.9780@d30g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
>> >> On Jun 9, 10:35 pm, Garrot <n... DeleteThis @email.invalid> wrote:
>> >>> c.s.ibmn.pc.games.flight-sim is completely irrelevant to PC gaming now
>> >>> and should be pemanently deleted. Sad to see what was at one time such
>> >>> a vibrant group reduced to a group almost as pathetic as the naval
>> >>> games group.
>>
>> >> If it bothers you don't read it. Whats so hard about that?
>>
>> > I think his point was that there -isn't- anything to read.
>>
>> And the solution to make SURE there isn't
>> anything to read?
>>
>> PC game forums may be in a doldrum for the
>> time being because of the Xbox craze but that
>> is no reason to get rid of them.
>
>The LOL. Oh for the halcyon days of the 1990s
>
>--scharmers

Hey scharmers thanks for the idea to blog.

PAPADOC

My Blog all about politics and the terror war.
www.papadoc.net/PinkFlamingoBar.html