|[IRL] Didn't we already win this fight?

"David Klassen" <klassen.TakeThisOut@rowan.edu> wrote in message
news:9dffbc08-eeab-4733-9b51-f3ed639d9329@w24g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 1, 7:52 pm, "Stanley Rexwinkle" <hahnt....TakeThisOut@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> "David Klassen" <klas....TakeThisOut@rowan.edu> wrote in message
>
> news:1886afcb-7c86-4164-ae8d-cc396c9f4c16@v15g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
> On Dec 30 2008, 7:38 am, "Stanley Rexwinkle" <hahnt....TakeThisOut@sbcglobal.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > When you teach a lie like "forgiving enemies being a virtue", you lie.
> > Forgiving enemies has never and will never be any virtue rather an
> > obscene
> > abomination. You're training wimps like yourself. It makes a weaker
> > America
> > that is quick to throw in the towel and surrender.
> >Do you really lack such a fundamental knowledge of history? Of
> >basic ethical tenets? Go look at the epic of Gilgamesh and then
> >tell me the ancient Babylonians thought forgiveness was an
> >abomination. Well, you will because you don't understand
> >anything outside your Rush O'Reily bubble.
>
> You are a wimp and should try military training. Try giving your wussy
> christian values the boot as they aren't worth bothering with.

I>n other words: you have no logical reasoning and are simply
>spewing garbage and lies. No surprise there.

>Oh, and how do you know I *don't* have military training....?

Coast Guard mop duty counts for squat. You're a wimp with no ability to
kill an enemy.

David Klassen wrote on [Fri, 2 Jan 2009 06:04:20 -0800 (PST)]:
> On Jan 1, 7:28 pm, "Stanley Rexwinkle" <hahnt... DeleteThis @sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>> "David Klassen" <klas... DeleteThis @rowan.edu> wrote in message
>>
>> news:1822ab9a-8197-47fb-a981-b9bca0787ffe@l39g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
>> On Dec 30 2008, 7:13 am, "Stanley Rexwinkle" <hahnt... DeleteThis @sbcglobal.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > If you don't want to die, then perhaps you should not STEAL.
>> >What about the people who  would die if they didn't steal?
>>
>> That's not my problem, nor should it be.
>
> http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=89164759

Did they fail to mention shpping the kid off to enemy island?

decalod85 wrote:
> On Jan 1, 6:30 pm, "Stanley Rexwinkle" <hahnt... DeleteThis @sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>> We need the death penalty for burglary. The thieves need to be punished.
>
> Many who live deserve death, and some that die deserve life. Can you
> give that to them?


Yes.

--
Sea Wasp
/^\
;;;
Live Journal: http://seawasp.livejournal.com

"Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)" <seawasp.DeleteThis@sgeinc.invalid.com> wrote in message
news:gjmd84$v7d$1@news.motzarella.org...
> decalod85 wrote:
>> On Jan 1, 6:30 pm, "Stanley Rexwinkle" <hahnt....DeleteThis@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>> We need the death penalty for burglary. The thieves need to be punished.
>>
>> Many who live deserve death, and some that die deserve life. Can you
>> give that to them?
>
>
> Yes.

I have no problem allowing them to lie in the bed they make on their own.

>
> --
> Sea Wasp
> /^\
> ;;; Live Journal: http://seawasp.livejournal.com

Justin <nospam RemoveThis @insightbb.com> wrote:

>David Klassen wrote on [Fri, 2 Jan 2009 06:04:20 -0800 (PST)]:
>> On Jan 1, 7:28 pm, "Stanley Rexwinkle" <hahnt... RemoveThis @sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>> "David Klassen" <klas... RemoveThis @rowan.edu> wrote in message
>>>
>>> news:1822ab9a-8197-47fb-a981-b9bca0787ffe@l39g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
>>> On Dec 30 2008, 7:13 am, "Stanley Rexwinkle" <hahnt... RemoveThis @sbcglobal.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> > If you don't want to die, then perhaps you should not STEAL.
>>> >What about the people who  would die if they didn't steal?
>>>
>>> That's not my problem, nor should it be.
>>
>> http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=89164759
>
>Did they fail to mention shpping the kid off to enemy island?

By Stanley's standards, North America is the enemy island. We just
need to find out how he got dumped here...
--

Kyle Wilson
email: myfirstname at wilson.mv.com

David Klassen wrote on [Fri, 2 Jan 2009 06:15:04 -0800 (PST)]:
> On Jan 1, 7:52 pm, "Stanley Rexwinkle" <hahnt....DeleteThis@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>> "David Klassen" <klas....DeleteThis@rowan.edu> wrote in message
>>
>> news:1886afcb-7c86-4164-ae8d-cc396c9f4c16@v15g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
>> On Dec 30 2008, 7:38 am, "Stanley Rexwinkle" <hahnt....DeleteThis@sbcglobal.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > When you teach a lie like "forgiving enemies being a virtue", you lie.
>> > Forgiving enemies has never and will never be any virtue rather an obscene
>> > abomination. You're training wimps like yourself. It makes a weaker
>> > America
>> > that is quick to throw in the towel and surrender.
>> >Do you really lack such a fundamental knowledge of history?  Of
>> >basic ethical tenets?  Go look at the epic of Gilgamesh and then
>> >tell me the ancient Babylonians thought forgiveness was an
>> >abomination.  Well, you will because you don't understand
>> >anything outside your Rush O'Reily bubble.
>>
>> You are a wimp and should try military training. Try giving your wussy
>> christian values the boot as they aren't worth bothering with.
>
> In other words: you have no logical reasoning and are simply
> spewing garbage and lies. No surprise there.
>
> Oh, and how do you know I *don't* have military training....?

The same way he knows who an illegal immigrant is...

Kyle Wilson wrote on [Fri, 02 Jan 2009 20:11:27 GMT]:
> Justin <nospam.DeleteThis@insightbb.com> wrote:
>
>>David Klassen wrote on [Fri, 2 Jan 2009 06:04:20 -0800 (PST)]:
>>> On Jan 1, 7:28 pm, "Stanley Rexwinkle" <hahnt....DeleteThis@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>>> "David Klassen" <klas....DeleteThis@rowan.edu> wrote in message
>>>>
>>>> news:1822ab9a-8197-47fb-a981-b9bca0787ffe@l39g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
>>>> On Dec 30 2008, 7:13 am, "Stanley Rexwinkle" <hahnt....DeleteThis@sbcglobal.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> > If you don't want to die, then perhaps you should not STEAL.
>>>> >What about the people who  would die if they didn't steal?
>>>>
>>>> That's not my problem, nor should it be.
>>>
>>> http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=89164759
>>
>>Did they fail to mention shpping the kid off to enemy island?
>
> By Stanley's standards, North America is the enemy island. We just
> need to find out how he got dumped here...

That's easy, he's an enemy as well.

On Jan 2, 6:59 pm, "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)"
<seaw... DeleteThis @sgeinc.invalid.com> wrote:
> decalod85 wrote:
> > On Jan 1, 6:30 pm, "Stanley Rexwinkle" <hahnt... DeleteThis @sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> >> We need the death penalty for burglary. The thieves need to be punished.
>
> > Many who live deserve death, and some that die deserve life.  Can you
> > give that to them?
>
>         Yes.

Oh, yeah, I forgot. Python.

http://xkcd.com/353/

On Jan 2, 9:03 pm, "Stanley Rexwinkle" <hahnt... RemoveThis @sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
> I have no problem allowing them to lie in the bed they make on their own.

Dawn take you, and be stone to you!

On Jan 2, 10:04 pm, "Stanley Rexwinkle" <hahnt... RemoveThis @sbcglobal.net>
wrote:
> "David Klassen" <klas... RemoveThis @rowan.edu> wrote in message
>
> >No, we don't.  Do you realize that death isn't really "punishment"?
> >It also appears to not serve as a deterrent.  Keeping someone on
> >death row, however, can be called a kind of torture.  Thus, at best,
> >the death penalty is mere vengeance.
>
> And vengeance is justice!

No, it isn't. You *seriously* need a dictionary.

On Jan 2, 10:08 pm, "Stanley Rexwinkle" <hahnt... RemoveThis @sbcglobal.net>
wrote:
> "David Klassen" <klas... RemoveThis @rowan.edu> wrote in message
> news:b0533c9b-696f-4537-aee5-8e69ce9df0c0@x14g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
> On Jan 1, 7:35 pm, "Stanley Rexwinkle" <hahnt... RemoveThis @sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
> > No not all life. Anyone who robs me or physically hurts me doesn't deserve
> > to have their life preserved by me ever. I feel perfectly fine with
> >Dude, that's kinda the *point*.  Think about it...
>
> I have thought about it and I still will never help them when they need it.

OK, so let's follow that "logic": you believe that folks who do
"wrong"
do not deserve help/protection/life preservation. Now, unless you
are the world's biggest hypocrite, you ought to believe that *you*
fall
under those same rules. Which means, once *you* have done "wrong"
your life no longer needs to be preserved by anyone else.

So, once *again*, I ask you: is this your belief? That if you should
get into any kind of trouble, the rest of the world should just walk
right past you to let you wallow in misery?

> >Yes---and what are *you* going to choose?
>
> To abandon my enemies when they lie dying. Let them simply perish. Their
> life is not sacred. Good riddance.

This is what makes you near-Evil. Technically, the behavior
is Neutral, but the intent behind your behavior is *seriously*
misanthropic and malevolent, ergo, Evil.

On Jan 2, 10:21 pm, "Stanley Rexwinkle" <hahnt....DeleteThis@sbcglobal.net>
wrote:
> "Justin" <nos....DeleteThis@insightbb.com> wrote in message
> news:slrnglqpnc.ps6.nospam@debian.dns2go.com...
> > Stanley Rexwinkle wrote on [Thu, 1 Jan 2009 16:49:42 -0800]:
>
> >> The proper thing to do would be to burn the losing country to the ground
> >> and salt the ground with sulfur.
>
> > Then no country would be habitable, moron.
>
> You first gather each city and burn all their cities to the ground. Then you

Ah... how to you *gather* cities...?

> burn all their possessions. Then you castrate all the males and break up all
> families. Then you totally disperse the conquered population within your
> lands with no conquered familes allowed to remain together as any unit. The

Yep, Evil.

> women don't have to be raped. They can pick husbands of your people or
> another nation, but their men will be eunichs and remaining with them will
> doom their line in that generation as the last one. Then you salt the ground
> lest they try to return, they should only find their former home a wasteland
> for decades. When the ground is again tillable, others will sieze it before
> the former inhabitants return to it and be entrenched.

What part of "Then no country would be habitable, moron."
did you not understand?! Oh, right, that last word...

On Jan 2, 10:23 pm, "Stanley Rexwinkle" <hahnt... RemoveThis @sbcglobal.net>
wrote:
>
> They could have overrun them even if they didn't. We could have nuked japan
> more. We chose not to.

Hiroshima? Nagasaki?

You, sir, are raving lunatic. We *did* nuke Japan. We used *every*
nuke we had on them.