GetClub Chess Stronger than ever !!!

On Aug 30, 11:53 am, Sanny <softta... RemoveThis @hotmail.com> wrote:
> Now, GetClub Chess is playing tremendously strong games.
>
> I played against Rybka & Jester and found it has no error now.
>
> Play Chess at:http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html
>
> I think all Bugs have gone out to party. So We can enjoy playing Chess
> at GetClub without Bugs.

Really now. I just tried it, and it didn't work at all.

> Now GetClub is so strong that I do not think anyone will ask me to
> improve it further.

Of course. Why extend a record of abject failure?

> So play a game and test for yourself how it is playing now. Tell me
> how you find the strength of GetClub.

On beginner level, as White, it played 1.e3 e5 2.h3 d5 3.d4. Not
exactly state-of-the-art opening play. It took about 3 minutes to get
that far, even though 10-20 seconds per move was advertised. Then it
refused to allow me to move. I tried to play 3...e4, but nothing
happened. So much for being bug-free.

> New Ratings for GetClub Levels are:-
>
> Beginner: 2200+
> Easy: 2300+
> Normal: 2400+

I notice that the supposed #1 player is the Advanced Level, rated
2400. And yet it has a won-lost record of +2 -51. Strange rating
calculations you use, Sanny.

> > I think all Bugs have gone out to party. So We can enjoy playing Chess
> > at GetClub without Bugs.
>
>   Really now. I just tried it, and it didn't work at all.

How can that happen I just played against Jester 2 min back.
You can see the recorded games played just now.

http://www.getclub.com/cc/showgame.php?num=10

> > Now GetClub is so strong that I do not think anyone will ask me to
> > improve it further.
>
>   Of course. Why extend a record of abject failure?
>
> > So play a game and test for yourself how it is playing now. Tell me
> > how you find the strength of GetClub.
>
>   On beginner level, as White, it played 1.e3 e5 2.h3 d5 3.d4. Not
> exactly state-of-the-art opening play. It took about 3 minutes to get
> that far, even though 10-20 seconds per move was advertised. Then it
> refused to allow me to move. I tried to play 3...e4, but nothing
> happened. So much for being bug-free.

Looks like your Internet Connection failiure You can always restart a
game as the game is recorded.

Next time you start it will start from the next move.

If any problem persist let me know.

Thanks
Sanny

Play Chess at:http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html

On Aug 30, 12:20 pm, Sanny <softta....RemoveThis@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > I think all Bugs have gone out to party. So We can enjoy playing Chess
> > > at GetClub without Bugs.
>
> >   Really now. I just tried it, and it didn't work at all.
>
> How can that happen I just played against Jester 2 min back.
> You can see the recorded games played just now.
>
> http://www.getclub.com/cc/showgame.php?num=10
>
> > > Now GetClub is so strong that I do not think anyone will ask me to
> > > improve it further.
>
> >   Of course. Why extend a record of abject failure?
>
> > > So play a game and test for yourself how it is playing now. Tell me
> > > how you find the strength of GetClub.
>
> >   On beginner level, as White, it played 1.e3 e5 2.h3 d5 3.d4. Not
> > exactly state-of-the-art opening play. It took about 3 minutes to get
> > that far, even though 10-20 seconds per move was advertised. Then it
> > refused to allow me to move. I tried to play 3...e4, but nothing
> > happened. So much for being bug-free.
>
> Looks like your Internet Connection failiure

No, there was no connection failure. The failure is in your program.

> Next time you start it will start from the next move.

I doubt I will waste the time.

> If any problem persist let me know.

The main problem is your persistent spamming.

> > Looks like your Internet Connection failiure
>
>   No, there was no connection failure. The failure is in your program.
>
> > Next time you start it will start from the next move.

Try once and let me know.

It happens sometimes that Internet connection breaks.

I find it do not play the opening moves too. As Opening is played in
"0" seconds while it was thinking for 12 seconds. This means you have
lots of web pages / programs open. Or you have not shut down your
computer after long hours of work.

Chess is a resource hungry program So it needs more resources. Try
again after restarting your browser. And close other programs So that
it works fast.

If you say I will remove this game from the database. So that you may
start a new game.

Bye
Sanny

taylor.kingston RemoveThis @comcast.net wrote:
> On Aug 30, 11:53 am, Sanny <softta... RemoveThis @hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Now, GetClub Chess is playing tremendously strong games.
>>
>> I played against Rybka & Jester and found it has no error now.
>>
>> Play Chess at:http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html
>>
>> I think all Bugs have gone out to party. So We can enjoy playing Chess
>> at GetClub without Bugs.
>
> Really now. I just tried it, and it didn't work at all.
>
>> Now GetClub is so strong that I do not think anyone will ask me to
>> improve it further.
>
> Of course. Why extend a record of abject failure?
>
>> So play a game and test for yourself how it is playing now. Tell me
>> how you find the strength of GetClub.
>
> On beginner level, as White, it played 1.e3 e5 2.h3 d5 3.d4. Not
> exactly state-of-the-art opening play. It took about 3 minutes to get
> that far, even though 10-20 seconds per move was advertised. Then it
> refused to allow me to move. I tried to play 3...e4, but nothing
> happened. So much for being bug-free.
>

FLAG! YOU LOSE!

GETCLUB CHESS YOU LONG TIME!

--
Kenneth Sloan KennethRSloan RemoveThis @gmail.com
Computer and Information Sciences +1-205-932-2213
University of Alabama at Birmingham FAX +1-205-934-5473
Birmingham, AL 35294-1170 http://KennethRSloan.com/

On Aug 30, 12:14 pm, taylor.kings... RemoveThis @comcast.net wrote:

> On Aug 30, 11:53 am, Sanny <softta... RemoveThis @hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Now, GetClub Chess is playing tremendously strong games.
> > I played against Rybka & Jester and found it has no error now.
> > Play Chess at:http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html
> > I think all Bugs have gone out to party. So We can enjoy playing Chess
> > at GetClub without Bugs.

>   Really now. I just tried it, and it didn't work at all.


As my old friend P.T. Barnum used to say:

"There's a sucker born every minute!"


> > Now GetClub is so strong that I do not think anyone will ask me to
> > improve it further.
>
>   Of course. Why extend a record of abject failure?
>
> > So play a game and test for yourself how it is playing now. Tell me
> > how you find the strength of GetClub.
>
>   On beginner level, as White, it played 1.e3 e5 2.h3 d5 3.d4. Not
> exactly state-of-the-art opening play. It took about 3 minutes to get
> that far, even though 10-20 seconds per move was advertised. Then it
> refused to allow me to move. I tried to play 3...e4, but nothing
> happened. So much for being bug-free.
>
> > New Ratings for GetClub Levels are:-
>
> > Beginner: 2200+
> > Easy: 2300+
> > Normal: 2400+
>
>   I notice that the supposed #1 player is the Advanced Level, rated
> 2400. And yet it has a won-lost record of +2 -51. Strange rating
> calculations you use, Sanny.


What strikes me as odd is the fact that the #2
ranked player, Zeb, has a few losses. Anyone
can see that he is using another chess engine,
so how did he ever manage to lose even a
single game to GC? It boggles the mind.

As for me, I can't seem to finish a game
against anything higher than the Normal (aka
"Notmal") level, because the program locks up
when it is about to be checkmated on the top
levels. Thus, my rating improvements are
restricted. Here are my new ratings:

help bot
-------------

Beginner 1500

Easy 1700

Normal 1900

Lucky 2100

Very lucky 2200


Note that my "very lucky" level depends
almost entirely on my opponent; will he,
say, hang his Queen, before I can find
some way to drop a piece? Don't laugh--
many famous grandmasters have lost in
fewer than fifteen moves, for similar
reasons.


-- help bot

On Aug 30, 12:31 pm, Sanny <softta....TakeThisOut@hotmail.com> wrote:

> It happens sometimes that Internet connection breaks.


You can say that again. I have had more
of these mysterious "breaks" while playing
at GC, than at any other time.


> I find it do not play the opening moves too. As Opening is played in
> "0" seconds while it was thinking for 12 seconds. This means you have
> lots of web pages / programs open. Or you have not shut down your
> computer after long hours of work.
>
> Chess is a resource hungry program So it needs more resources. Try
> again after restarting your browser. And close other programs So that
> it works fast.


Sanny, why not reduce the number of these
"errors" by instructing the Java applet to not
hog all the resources? That way, users can
play chess and still do other things in the
background (i.e. multitasking) while the
program thinks. A reduction from 99% to
just a 90% hog-fest could potentially solve
most of these problems.

Trust me-- the program's strength is not
going to be affected much, either way.


-- help bot

> >   I notice that the supposed #1 player is the Advanced Level, rated
> > 2400. And yet it has a won-lost record of +2 -51. Strange rating
> > calculations you use, Sanny.
>
>   What strikes me as odd is the fact that the #2
> ranked player, Zeb, has a few losses.  Anyone
> can see that he is using anotherchessengine,
> so how did he ever manage to lose even a
> single game to GC?  It boggles the mind.

He lost 2 games against Advanced Level as Advance was taking 5 hours
for a move. So to discontinue the game He Resigned Twice.

Bye
Sanny

Play Chess at: http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html

> >Chessis a resource hungry program So it needs more resources. Try
> > again after restarting your browser. And close other programs So that
> > it works fast.
>
>   Sanny, why not reduce the number of these
> "errors" by instructing the Java applet to not
> hog all the resources?  That way, users can
> playchessand still do other things in the
> background (i.e. multitasking) while the
> program thinks.  A reduction from 99% to
> just a 90% hog-fest could potentially solve
> most of these problems.

If one has dual processor then he can do two works together. As
GetClub will use only 1 processor and other processor can be used for
all other works.

GetClub Chess atleast needs 1 processor power to play.

Glad to Intel they are producing Dual & Quad Processors. Soon they
will bring out 6 Processor Computer too.

Scrulltrail will have 12 Processors. So On these huge computers one
can think of doing 10 tasks simultaniously.

But if you have a single core processor you should do one task at a
time.

Either play or do other works.

Bye
Sanny

Play Chess at:http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html

* Sanny <softtanks DeleteThis @hotmail.com> (18:31) schrieb:

> It happens sometimes that Internet connection breaks.

Yes, things like that happen. A program knows this probably happened
when it can't talk to its server any more. It should display an error
message to the user and ask what to do.

mfg, simon .... l

> > I think all Bugs have gone out to party. So We can enjoy playing Chess
> > at GetClub without Bugs.
>
>   Really now. I just tried it, and it didn't work at all.
>   On beginner level, as White, it played 1.e3 e5 2.h3 d5 3.d4. Not
> exactly state-of-the-art opening play. It took about 3 minutes to get
> that far, even though 10-20 seconds per move was advertised. Then it
> refused to allow me to move. I tried to play 3...e4, but nothing
> happened. So much for being bug-free.

Not a single bug was found. Everything is correct at GetClub end. 5
Games have been played with no error So It is high chances your
internet connection broke at the time you moved.

Nothing to worry about, You can complete the game
by re-login at. http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html

As your game is recorded you can start from where you left.

Try using minimum Browsers and programs when playing Chess.

Bye
Sanny

Play Chess at. http://www.GetClub.com/Chess.html

* help bot <nomorechess.RemoveThis@hotmail.com> (06:30) schrieb:

> Sanny, why not reduce the number of these
> "errors" by instructing the Java applet to not
> hog all the resources? That way, users can
> play chess and still do other things in the
> background (i.e. multitasking) while the
> program thinks. A reduction from 99% to
> just a 90% hog-fest could potentially solve
> most of these problems.

No, the engine needs to get the resources it can, it's no good to leave
the processor idle even part of the time. The right way to address the
issue of slowing down all the other programs is to give the thread that
does the searching low priority.

That's what my program does: The processor is always at 100%, but the
other programs including the non-searching part of my program are
responsive. I can play a video from the Internet while analyzing some
chess position.

mfg, simon .... l

Sanny <softtanks DeleteThis @hotmail.com> writes:

> Now, GetClub Chess is playing tremendously strong games.
>
> I think all Bugs have gone out to party. So We can enjoy playing Chess
> at GetClub without Bugs.
>
> So play a game and test for yourself how it is playing now. Tell me
> how you find the strength of GetClub.
>
> Start with Beginner then go and play with Easy if you succeed.
>
> New Ratings for GetClub Levels are:-
>
> Beginner: 2200+

There is at least one bug left. In the game below GetClub managed to
draw against my Novag Constellation for the first time. However, a
"Claim draw" button is missing in GetClub. Therefore when Novag
claimed a draw at move 94 there was no way to enter that claim into
the GetClub program. The draw claim was valid according to the 50 move
rule. As a result GetClub thinks the game is still ongoing even though
according to standard chess rules the games is drawn.

[Date "2008.08.31"]
[White "Novag Constellation 3.6MHz, 30s/move"]
[Black "GetClub beginner level"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Nf6 4. d4 exd4 5. O-O Nxe4 6. Re1 d5 7. Bxd5
Qxd5 8. Nc3 Qh5 9. Nxe4 Be6 10. Bg5 b6 11. Nxd4 Qxd1 12. Raxd1 Nxd4 13.
Rxd4 c5 14. Nd6+ Bxd6 15. Rxd6 O-O 16. b3 Rfe8 17. c3 Bxb3 18. Re7 Rxe7 19.
Bxe7 Be6 20. Rd2 Re8 21. a3 c4 22. Bd6 Rd8 23. f3 g6 24. Kf2 f6 25. Ke3 Kg7
26. Rd4 g5 27. f4 Rd7 28. fxg5 fxg5 29. Bb8 a6 30. Bd6 b5 31. Kd2 Kg6 32.
Ke3 a5 33. Kd2 h5 34. Ke3 h4 35. Kd2 h3 36. gxh3 Rh7 37. Bg3 Rxh3 38. Rd6
Kf5 39. Ra6 a4 40. Ra7 Rh8 41. Rb7 Rd8+ 42. Kc2 Rd5 43. Bc7 g4 44. Bg3 Bd7
45. Rb8 Ke4 46. Rg8 Bf5 47. Kc1 Rd3 48. Be1 Rh3 49. Bg3 Ke3 50. Rg5 Bd7 51.
Re5+ Kf3 52. Re7 Bc8 53. Kd2 Rh6 54. Rc7 Rh8 55. Rf7+ Kg2 56. Rf2+ Kh3 57.
Rf7 Rd8+ 58. Ke2 Kg2 59. Rf2+ Kh3 60. Rf7 Rd7 61. Rf8 Bb7 62. Kf1 Rh7 63.
Kf2 Be4 64. Bf4 Bb1 65. Rf6 Rh8 66. Re6 Rh5 67. Re3+ Kh4 68. Bg3+ Kg5 69.
Re1 Bc2 70. Re2 Bd3 71. Re8 Kg6 72. Rg8+ Kf5 73. Rd8 Be4 74. Rf8+ Kg5 75.
Bf4+ Kg6 76. Rg8+ Kf5 77. Rf8+ Ke6 78. Re8+ Kd5 79. Rd8+ Kc6 80. Rg8 Bf5
81. Re8 Bc2 82. Rg8 Bf5 83. Re8 Bd7 84. Rg8 Rh7 85. Rd8 Bf5 86. Rf8 Bc2 87.
Rg8 Bf5 88. Rf8 Bc2 89. Rg8 Rh3 90. Bg3 Bd1 91. Rg6+ Kb7 92. Rg7+ Kb6 93.
Rg6+ Kb7 94. Rg7+
{Draw by fifty-move rule} 1/2-1/2

--
Peter Osterlund - petero2 DeleteThis @telia.com
http://web.telia.com/~u89404340