On 3 apr, 13:03, Giftzwerg <giftzwerg... DeleteThis @NOSPAMZ.hotmail.com> wrote:
> In article <e5f598bf-c310-4c77-aa38-
> 45f1722b6... DeleteThis @a1g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>, eddyster... DeleteThis @hotmail.com
> says...
>
> > Get all the info here :
>
> >http://www.battlefront.com/products/cmsf/downloads.html
>
> <looks at watch>
>
> And how long ago was it that the fanboys were telling us 1.07 was just
> the beat-all-to-end-all?
IIRC CM:BO had 12 patches - I think CM:SF will come close to breaking
that record
That said : the thing which gets under my skin most is reviewers
trying to hide the ugly truth from their readers. There's this French
language mag which from before CM:SF was even released was singing
it's praise in every issue - mostly because the editor-in-chief is a
fanboy. There's been a CM:SF preview/review/article/AAR/ Whatever in
*every* issue, yet only in the current issue is there a 2 by 2 inch
admission that the original release might not have been ready for
consumption and a promise that the upcoming patch (1.07) would fix a
lot of issues.
In the end this sort of behaviour is not only hurting his own magazine
but also the wargame publisher. Battlefront took *more* heat because
they were in denial than they ever would have if they had come clean
from the start.
Greetz,
Eddy Sterckx