1861 Diary w/ mahjong

> > As has been said before, but it is important, the poster who is the
> > subject of this post is not categorized with these failings because of
> > his dissenting opinions, but because of the manner in which he behaves
> > in topic discussions in this forum.

With reference to the above, readers are given ample examples of the
previous poster's behaviour in the topics listed in previous posts.
This is especially important when considering the previous posters
behaviour towards the use of dated evidence when inferring a
chronological development in a logical manner. The is repeated failure
to understand the role of evidence and assumptions in explanations
when pointed out and a repeated failure to recognise or admit the lack
of direct evidence for their ideas when those ideas are put forward
for others expected serious consideration.

When those ideas are found wanting the poster then begins an agenda of
deliberate distortion of the ideas of his critics through the
irrational abuse, distortion or misreading or denial of evidence.

All may be found under the Mahjong topics listed in previous posts.